1
Bug Reports / Re: 8192x8192 generated texture has the same level of detail as 4096x4096 texture?
« on: November 05, 2017, 03:51:23 PM »
Hi Alexey,
I tried putting together some sample data, although the surface area is significantly smaller (I couldn't share our previous project data that we were having trouble with).
4086: https://i.imgur.com/nxgNthV.jpg
8192: https://i.imgur.com/81mS3X7.jpg
This time, it seems like there might be a slight difference between the two resolutions, although it's pretty hard to tell. What do you think?
I feel like there should be more of an improvement between 4086 and 8192, but it's also possible that the amount of surface area for this test was too small, so instead I reached a limit with the detail/quality level of each photograph - I'm not really sure. If this data isn't sufficient, I think I should photograph a much larger surface area so that the pixel/meter density becomes the definite bottleneck. I might be able to do some more tests and try to make better sample data, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to get to that.
I tried putting together some sample data, although the surface area is significantly smaller (I couldn't share our previous project data that we were having trouble with).
4086: https://i.imgur.com/nxgNthV.jpg
8192: https://i.imgur.com/81mS3X7.jpg
This time, it seems like there might be a slight difference between the two resolutions, although it's pretty hard to tell. What do you think?
I feel like there should be more of an improvement between 4086 and 8192, but it's also possible that the amount of surface area for this test was too small, so instead I reached a limit with the detail/quality level of each photograph - I'm not really sure. If this data isn't sufficient, I think I should photograph a much larger surface area so that the pixel/meter density becomes the definite bottleneck. I might be able to do some more tests and try to make better sample data, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to get to that.