Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - andrekje

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
General / Re: GCP questions:
« on: January 19, 2017, 08:57:25 PM »
One more question about #4
you wrote "...the coordinate system for cameras and markers are different.."

My question is not about referance system, both camera and markers are in same ESPG:....   - but the altitude used in markers , is "NN1958"  - an Norwegian elevation model, made to give an proper AMSL value, compansating for geoide and gravitys effect on water.

does your answer apply to that scenario ?

General / Re: GCP questions:
« on: January 19, 2017, 08:32:11 PM »
Thank you, very informative.
May I suggest for the cjheckbox column to be named "enable" or have a tooltip telling that it's an enable/disable (as some may think it's a selection/group action feature)
Likewise, please add a tooltip to "accuracy" column, mentioning the X/Y/Z alternative

General / GCP questions:
« on: January 19, 2017, 05:17:57 PM »
1:  the checkbox left  to a marker (to left for "long,lat,alt,accuracy,error"...)    - does it enable/disable a given GCP for processing ?

2: if there is a marker, (GCP) , but it is not placed in any photo ( "it's icon is not green, but grey")  does it have any influence on the processing ?

3: is it possible to have a marker only be used for altitude only ? (aka - the position is +/- 10meters, but we know that flat area had a given altitude of meters)

4: imagine all photos for a map contain ellipsoid (GPS) altitude, then we add some GCP's with local geoid corrected altitude, - is the result expected to be "good" ?  - or does all altitudes, (in exif too)  - need to be geoide corrected ?

1: please add an action "create directory"
before exporting tiled data, it would be very nice to be able to
mkdir {projectfolder}/Tiledoutput

2: please add "enable/disable" checkbox per script action
When using complex scripts that are supposed to do a lot, from start to end, - you may sometimes do something, or want to do something manually.   
So it would be very useful if we could just disable (skip) steps , without altering the script.

General / Re: Is batch with relative paths/names possible ?
« on: November 16, 2016, 07:55:15 PM »
how can an non-existing folder be created during a batch ?
An attempt to export to non-existing path gives "Error: Can't create file:"

General / Re: Is batch with relative paths/names possible ?
« on: November 16, 2016, 04:39:22 PM »
fantastic :) - thank you

General / Is batch with relative paths/names possible ?
« on: November 16, 2016, 04:04:08 PM »
my projects are usually in own folder:
~/photoscan projects/placename/placename.psx

making a batch that ends with multiple exports, is hard, because every export needs it's path, like:
import photos from:
~/photoscan projects/placename/photos/*
~/photoscan projects/placename/placename-orto/placename-orto.tiff
~/photoscan projects/placename/placename-dem/placename-dem.tiff
~/photoscan projects/placename/placename-las/placename.las

I miss the possibility to script something like:
# %pname% is the name of .psx file
# %ppath% is the path of the .psx file


This way . a script would be perfectly re-usable between projects.
this way - the same batch could be used on every dataset, and

libpng12 is no longer in repositories , 16 is..

can be solved by getting the older library:
but it would be sweet if you could handle the newer one too :)

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.3.0 pre-release
« on: October 14, 2016, 08:02:54 PM »
please fix this issue before releasing:

it won't be fooled into using a newer library v16..

sudo ln /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
./photoscan: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ version `PNG12_0' not found (required by .../photoscan-pro/./

an attempt to load w/o the .sh file shows that:
$ ldd ./photoscan |grep png => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ (0x00007f2394b10000)

$ ./photoscan
./photoscan: error while loading shared libraries:

executing the .sh file gives the error in subject.

Feature Requests / Re: "Surface extraction"
« on: September 26, 2016, 11:16:57 AM »
Thank you.
So I classified the point cloud, visually, , by color, I see only houses/buildings , on top of brown (ground level) and no low (<1m vegetation)
Is there a way to display all detected classes, one by one ?

Feature Requests / "Surface extraction"
« on: August 04, 2016, 12:17:50 PM »
Is there a feature that can rutomatically remove objects/trees from DEM data ?

Thank you, yes, I know that's the usual way,  just needed to verify that everything after needed to be recomputed.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5