Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pastouf

Pages: [1] 2
1
General / Re: 1.6.2 Export LAS Pb
« on: April 02, 2020, 10:03:53 AM »
Hello,
Sorry for the response time, but that was it.
I deactivated the form and it's perfect.
thank you so much

2
General / 1.6.2 Export LAS Pb
« on: March 20, 2020, 08:04:48 PM »
Hi All,
When i export las file from dense cloud, since 1.6.2 i have this pb

I test with old version 1.5.1 and no pb.
Any idea?

3
General / Re: GTX 1080 G1 configuration
« on: April 09, 2019, 03:11:37 PM »
to compare with pix4d, GPU is used at 90% (Align, Computing match) instead of 2/5% for Metashape.

CPU is more important for Agisoft

4
Python and Java API / Re: Define Bounding Box By Camera Locations
« on: February 07, 2019, 01:59:52 PM »
Hi All,
I try to test this script but i dont understand how to apply this?

In fact, i want to define bounding box with 4 markers or 4 gps.
I have 20,000 photos and to save computing time and export only the area where I want to work on the point cloud. I would like to define a smallest possible calculation area for me and thus export a las file corresponding to my work area, but not the entire area.
I can work on lighter files and focus on my work area.

thank you in advance

5
General / Re: GCP Precision : difference between 1.2.6 vs 1.4 5650
« on: January 30, 2018, 12:07:36 AM »
finally, it's not good.
Project alignement with 1.2.6 and add marker is good after in 1.2.6 or 1.4
But Projet Alignement with 1.4  and add marker , so precision is more than 11cm ???


6
General / Re: GCP Precision : difference between 1.2.6 vs 1.4 5650
« on: January 29, 2018, 11:56:47 PM »
I found...
On last version and not on beta. system and marker

system and marker was not in the same coordinate system

When i re-install last version it was not 5650 but 5076...

i dont understand why system coordinate was in 3945 and not in 3949 ???

More test and comparaison tomorrow, but it's my fault...

Very very sorry.
I stop coffe...

7
General / Re: GCP Precision : difference between 1.2.6 vs 1.4 5650
« on: January 29, 2018, 11:49:04 PM »
in attach view of setting for each version
only différence on camera accuracy in deg

8
General / GCP Precision : difference between 1.2.6 vs 1.4 5650
« on: January 29, 2018, 08:37:32 PM »
Hello,

On my last project. Markers are bad précision ( > 10cm)
812 photos, 12 markers
On 1.4 : 0.119 cm of précision
On 1.2.6 : 0.012 cm of précision

Why this différence?

Coordinate systeme : 3949

I have not tested version 1.3.x

Align is mode Medium or high, and without Geotag on photo.
After insert Marker position, and optimisation, precision is very different between this 2 versions.

An idea?

9
General / Re: How to create Thermal Model 3D?
« on: April 02, 2017, 01:21:22 PM »
Link to download first 10 images in thermal and RGB format.

http://ovh.to/Siv8xi9
Link will be avaible during 30 days only

10
General / Re: How to create Thermal Model 3D?
« on: April 02, 2017, 12:46:52 PM »
Alex,

I upload all image on hubic and i share file asap for test.

CamMakoJ

I have standart images with geotag, and Thermal Image without geotag.

Regards

11
General / Re: How to create Thermal Model 3D?
« on: March 27, 2017, 09:46:01 PM »
I don't know procédure?
could you explain quickly how to do?

i test this, i have download all images and i test this asap.


12
General / How to create Thermal Model 3D?
« on: March 27, 2017, 07:04:47 PM »
Result from this link is very excellent
[invalid link removed]

Model 3D standart and thermal.

How to create this modèl with photoscan?
Ok for standart image but impossible for me to align thermal image from DJI XT caméra.
In mode généric and Low, Medium, High or highest, i have no more 76 camera on 564 which are align...

After analyse files, i think they applies texture from thermal image, but how ???

13
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.3.0 pre-release
« on: October 12, 2016, 05:28:31 PM »
still no email notification?
 >:(

14
General / Re: Agisoft Vs Competitors
« on: December 07, 2015, 07:08:47 PM »
10/20 min for 1200 images!!! :'(

i have bi-xeon E5-2650 2Ghz, 64Go, SSD, et for 300 images, align time is 48 min...

could you detailed your PC please.
I hope that my PC is not too old...

15
General / Re: Agisoft Vs Competitors
« on: December 07, 2015, 12:06:31 PM »
Arie,

could you detailled parameters.
For 1200 images, PS take 3 hours only...

Pages: [1] 2