1
General / Re: Alignment Inconsistencies
« on: February 22, 2017, 07:57:41 PM »
Thanks Alexey. I have emailed the data as requested.
Rue
Rue
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
General / Re: Alignment Inconsistencies
« on: February 22, 2017, 11:12:05 AM »
Apologies, I meant cmeras not chunks - I have modified the above.
Rue
Rue
3
General / Alignment Inconsistencies
« on: February 22, 2017, 10:13:46 AM »
Hi everyone,
I hope you're well.
I am getting inconsistent alignments.
Model 1
The first model I created used only my high level drone photographs (105 cameras). I was happy with this model though it misses a lot of the detail from the front elevation of the building: https://skfb.ly/6nP7s
Model 2
I thought, no problem, I will now run a model with all of my pictures (ground and drone) to fill in the gaps - 303 cameras total. This model however came out worse - and I suspect that there are too many cameras which has confused the software?? https://skfb.ly/6nSCB
Model 3
I thought, no problem, I will re-run a model with the drone pictures with the addition of the ground level photos which show only the missing elevations of the building - to fill in the gaps.
This model has captured the areas missing in the second model, but completely missed the elevations of the building which were fantastic on models 1 and 2.
Obviously I stopped following the build of dense cloud. Each model is taking many hours to produce.
Can anyone offer help or an explanation please?
Thanks,
Rue
I hope you're well.
I am getting inconsistent alignments.
Model 1
The first model I created used only my high level drone photographs (105 cameras). I was happy with this model though it misses a lot of the detail from the front elevation of the building: https://skfb.ly/6nP7s
Model 2
I thought, no problem, I will now run a model with all of my pictures (ground and drone) to fill in the gaps - 303 cameras total. This model however came out worse - and I suspect that there are too many cameras which has confused the software?? https://skfb.ly/6nSCB
Model 3
I thought, no problem, I will re-run a model with the drone pictures with the addition of the ground level photos which show only the missing elevations of the building - to fill in the gaps.
This model has captured the areas missing in the second model, but completely missed the elevations of the building which were fantastic on models 1 and 2.
Obviously I stopped following the build of dense cloud. Each model is taking many hours to produce.
Can anyone offer help or an explanation please?
Thanks,
Rue
4
General / Exporting Issues
« on: July 23, 2015, 05:44:33 PM »
Hi,
I use Photoscan to record historic buildings. I am getting great results when completing the workflow but I somehow need to export to a format that can be sent to clients who don't have/need Photoscan.
I have been experimenting with .pdf, but the files are so big that navigating around the subject is very slow. I decimated down to a size that can be navigated in adobe reader quite well but the quality is very poor.
Am I missing a very basic trick here or is there something else that I can try?
Thank you.
I use Photoscan to record historic buildings. I am getting great results when completing the workflow but I somehow need to export to a format that can be sent to clients who don't have/need Photoscan.
I have been experimenting with .pdf, but the files are so big that navigating around the subject is very slow. I decimated down to a size that can be navigated in adobe reader quite well but the quality is very poor.
Am I missing a very basic trick here or is there something else that I can try?
Thank you.
Pages: [1]
