Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - ruadi

Pages: [1]
1
Bug Reports / building tiled model with 1.5.0 7492 crashes computer hard
« on: January 14, 2019, 01:18:39 PM »
Hello,
I tried out several times building tiled models using 100 DJI-images without any problems.
Using Ultracam aerial images (17004x26460) did crash the computer really hard after ca. 50% of the GPU work (goto line 652 of the log).
There is no even a system-crash log...

The preceding image alignement worked without any errors.
Is it related to large images ? FirePro D700 ?
I assumed the tiling approach avoids the "image is too large" problem

Ruedi

2
Bug Reports / Python with PhotoScan.RasterTransformValue
« on: January 03, 2018, 03:14:53 PM »
Hi there,
I try to use raster-transforms, actually to export NDVI-Orthos.
When I run my script, a RunTimeError occurs, when exporting the ortho
Without "raster_transform = PhotoScan.RasterTransformValue", everything works fine.
Do I use the wrong syntax ?

Thanks, Ruedi


...
               self.chunk.raster_transform.formula = ["(B4-B2)/(B4+B2)"]
               self.chunk.raster_transform.calibrateRange()
               self.chunk.raster_transform.enabled = True
               self.chunk.exportOrthomosaic(saveOrtho, image_format = PhotoScan.ImageFormatTIFF, raster_transform = PhotoScan.RasterTransformValue)
...
Log:
2018-01-03 10:46:00 Agisoft PhotoScan Professional Version: 1.4.0 build 5650 (64 bit)
2018-01-03 10:46:00 Platform: Mac OS
2018-01-03 10:46:00 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5670  @ 2.93GHz (server)
...
2018-01-03 12:43:33     self.chunk.exportOrthomosaic(saveOrtho, image_format = PhotoScan.ImageFormatTIFF, raster_transform = PhotoScan.RasterTransformValue)
2018-01-03 12:43:33 RuntimeError: Invalid data type
2018-01-03 12:43:33 Error: Invalid data type


3
Feature Requests / Sequoia import (work around for missing channel files)
« on: September 12, 2017, 02:00:04 PM »
Hello Agisoft,
Recently I had a couple of Sequoia-datasets (using v1.4.1 Sequoia firmware...) with partially missing channel-files, e.g. a single xxxGRE.TIF or xxxRED.TIF was missing. Typically only 1 single file  from 400 is missing.
Unfortunately when Photoscan v1.3.x detects a missing channel, it treats all images as normal dataset and the multispectral-import does not appear.

I would suggest the following approach:
Please only check if the single multispectral image-tuple is complete (_GRE.TIF,_NIR.TIF,_RED.TIF,_REG.TIF (don't care about the rgb.JPG)). If one of the images in a 4-tuple is missing, skip only this tuple and continue searching.

4
Python and Java API / Null elevation
« on: March 08, 2017, 04:39:49 PM »
Hello Agisoft,

Using 113 UAV images (with X,Y,Z) and 3 GCP with proper X,Y,Z-values

Everything like build dense cloud, etc. runs fine with my Python script
With Build 3772 the scripts stops ending up in the GUI-Console with:
...
2017-03-08 14:27:50     self.chunk.exportDem(saveDEM)
2017-03-08 14:27:50 RuntimeError: Null elevation

With Build-version 2834 and older versions it runs without any complaints and generates a proper report, DEM,etc.
There is an PhotoScan.Elevation-class, but how to handle it ? in previous builds, the reference height was obviously tkane from the GCP-data  !(?)


5
Hello,
we are using a FLIR-camera and the same set of images works fine concerning aligning,dense cloud,etc. with v116 and v125.
Each input image is a 1-channel Float32 TIFF, containing temperature values, typically 10..40.
With v116 I get a descent temperature  Orthomosaic in channel 1.
With the current v125 the scaling of the Orthomosaic is now somehow strangely normalized (I tried also with  PhotoScan.BlendingMode=DisabledBlending).
How to get the channel layout (and disabled scaling ) of v116 ?
Ruedi

Float32-images with v1.1.6
 
Band 1 Block=2647x32 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Gray
  Minimum=-17.021, Maximum=49.017, Mean=10.409, StdDev=9.912
  Metadata:
    STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=49.017379760742
    STATISTICS_MEAN=10.409090188344
    STATISTICS_MINIMUM=-17.020740509033
    STATISTICS_STDDEV=9.9120056741228
Band 2 Block=2647x32 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Alpha
  Minimum=0.000, Maximum=1.000, Mean=0.541, StdDev=0.498
  Metadata:
    STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=1
    STATISTICS_MEAN=0.5414550280809
    STATISTICS_MINIMUM=0
    STATISTICS_STDDEV=0.49827851714359


Float32-images with v1.2.5 (2735)

Band 1 Block=256x256 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Gray
  Min=0.000 Max=0.000
  Minimum=0.000, Maximum=0.000, Mean=0.000, StdDev=0.000
  Overviews: 1376x836, 688x418, 344x209, 172x105
  Metadata:
    STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=0
    STATISTICS_MEAN=0
    STATISTICS_MINIMUM=0
    STATISTICS_STDDEV=0
Band 2 Block=256x256 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Alpha
  Min=0.000 Max=1.000
  Minimum=0.000, Maximum=1.000, Mean=0.663, StdDev=0.473
  Overviews: 1376x836, 688x418, 344x209, 172x105
  Metadata:
    STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=1
    STATISTICS_MEAN=0.66312668646378
    STATISTICS_MINIMUM=0
    STATISTICS_STDDEV=0.47264117908128

6
Hi,
Opening projects and launching Photoscan works fine, the world would be even better if as additional parameters a related python script with its argument could be added on command line:
in MacOS-unix:

open -a PhotoScanPro.app /Volumes/BigData/project09638.psx runPHScanner.py projectParameters09638.txt


preferably also for Windows/Linux...

Ruedi

7
Hi,
I switch recently from 1.0.4 to 1.1, after processing the same images I got strange results (manually AND with the python-interface!):
The PDF-report shows (why is no option for an ascii-export of the report...?):

Page 2: Survey Data:
Number of images: 514
Flying altitude: 260.191 m
Ground resolution: 0.0791013 m/pix
Coverage area: 2.33455 sq km
Camera stations: 514
Tie-points: 78246
Projections: 343834
Error: 2.22708 pix

Page 4: Ground Control Points:
Total (last line):
X-Error (m):   0.007136
Y-Error (m):   0.013967
Z-Error (m):   0.022269
Error (m):      0.027238
Projections:   23
Error (pix):   0.296075

Page 6: DEM:
Resolution: 4.24915 m/pix
Point density: 0.0553855 points per sq m

The ortho was export with 7cm resolution and is looking perfectly, the DEM was exported with 4.2m and was (of course...) very coarse.
Forcing the DEM-export down to 7cm revealed, that the technical pixelsize was 7cm, but the effective level-of-detail was still 4.2m.


Pages: [1]