Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - claytonb8298

Pages: [1]
1
Hello, and thank you ahead of time for the help.

We have a project that we flew approximately 60 photographs in a nadir camera orientation and 60 photographs with a 78 degree oblique camera orientation.  We used PPK to control the camera location at the time of photograph capture and all camera positions where within 6 feet elevation of each other according to the PPK results.

After importing the photographs, converting the camera positions to California State Plane Zone 5 coordinates and importing the source position PPK control file, we aligned the photographs and this is where things got weird.

All of the oblique and a portion of the nadir (about 2/3) aligned to the same elevation as the PPK source, with a portion of the nadir (about 1/3) aligned at a much lower elevation (about 50 feet lower).

More details:

For the nadir flight the first two flight lines aligned at the same elevation as the PPK coordinates and the oblique aligned camera positions.  This is the first 1 - 18 photographs.  Photograph number 19 is at the turn to the third flight line and it is about halfway in elevation between photograph 18 position and photograph 20 position.  After and including photograph 20 the remaining nadir photographs (20 - 57) are at an aligned elevation approximately 50 lower than the first 18 nadir and all the oblique camera positions.

If I process just the nadir by themselves, the weirdest thing happens, the nadir camera positions align to a coordinate position that is lower in elevation than the sparse point cloud point elevations.  As if the UAV was flying upside down inside some tunnel and was capturing photographs above the UAV or on the "ceiling" of land above it.  Which of course is not the case.

I am attaching two screen grabs, one showing the nadir and oblique aligned camera positions and one screen grab showing the nadir only camera positions.  I am also attaching a reduced resolution aerial ortho mosaic I was able to complete using the oblique images.

I appreciate any help that you can offer.  Thank you.  I have never seen this behavior before.


2
General / Point Cloud Delete Points by Confidence
« on: March 21, 2024, 06:21:09 PM »
Hello,
When computing the point cloud in Metashape we have the program calculate confidence of each point.  You can then view the confidence of points in the model by color, hot colors have lower confidence and cool colors have higher confidence, i.e. red = is the lowest confidence and blue is the highest, and the order goes as the rainbow would, red, orange, yellow, green, blue.

You can then filter what is seen and selectable by that confidence and therefore delete the points of the lowest or lower confidence to begin cleaning up the point cloud noise.

The issue I am having is when I set the point cloud to display points of confidence between 0 - 4 and then select what is shown and delete, this delete process never deletes all those points, even when I have selected a window that obviously includes them all.  Even more frustrating, as I change my view point or view elevation, more points show up within the area I just deleted.  Meaning, I can never be certain I have deleted all the points that are within my chosen confidence interval.  This continues and continues until I get frustrated and give up.

Of course, I am hoping @Alexey Pasumansky  has the answer.  But I am truly hopeful for an answer from anyone.  :)

Thank you, Clayton

3
General / Import .csv marker file
« on: January 12, 2023, 12:14:21 AM »
Hello,

I am looking for a way to import a simple marker file that has the following characteristics.

GCP, Image_name, x pixel, y pixel
GCP, Image_name, x pixel, y pixel
GCP, Image_name, x pixel, y pixel
GCP, Image_name, x pixel, y pixel
etc.

We have moved to Agisoft Metashape from Pix4d and have many projects that have been completed in Pix4d that we may need to revisit using Metashape.  But to have to revisit and recontrol the project in Metashape is not something we would want to do.

Pix4d has two export options for markers, one is a simple .csv file like that above, and the other is a Pix4d .xml file.

Metashape allows for a marker input by Metashape .xml, not at all by .csv.  The really confusing thing is it seems like the .xml version should be attempting a universal export that most softwares could understand.

I have found scripts for exporting a .csv formatted marker file like that above, but not for importing something similar.

Any help is appreciated.

Clayton

Pages: [1]