Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - rival29

Pages: [1]
1
Feature Requests / Gradual Selection (visualized)
« on: April 14, 2016, 06:53:32 PM »
ok, gradual selection is key in optimizing camera alignment. Is there any way to integrate some sort of graph that shows the gaussian distribution of reprojection errors? The slider works fine, but its tough to find the mean reprojection error this way. Something similar to cloudcompares integration would be ideal with the colorful chart that tells you the percentage of errors per dataset.

2
General / OpenCL co-processors
« on: October 18, 2013, 06:17:26 PM »
I was curious if anyone has tried or uses Xeon Phi or Tesla co-processors with Photoscan Pro

3
Bug Reports / Mask Behavior
« on: July 31, 2013, 07:30:57 PM »
So Im not sure if this is an isolated occurrence, but it seems to do it to me on multiple projects. Projects involve high altitude aerial imagery of a Hawaiian coastline. Since the ocean surface is moving and creates dynamic lighting effects, i use masks to exclude these regions from image alignment. This is done in photoshop using the intelligence selection tool which is much faster than using the included photoscan mask tools. in each photo, a new alpha channel is created from the selection and the image is saved as a tiff. Photoscan is able to import the masks using this procedure fine. The masks photo view shows water covered regions in black while the areas of modeling interest are shown in white. All my control points are in place, images are aligned and the point cloud is optimized. since i don't really care about building a mesh, i usually just select all the photos and click build depth. this works fine as well. After i have depth maps i have the option of exporting a DEM. here is where i run into problems, if i export a DEM or and orthomosaic without resetting the masks for all the images, the DEM and ortho are clipped inversely to how they are being used. By this i mean that the masks work fine for image alignment by excluding the regions i don't want, i can tell because the point cloud model of the alignment points have no trace of points in ocean regions, but when exporting DEM or orthomosaic the masks seem to be working inversely. I can work around this by resetting the masks for the entire group of photos, and then exporting, however if i need to do any last minute optimizations or realignments, i have to re-import the masks or create an inverted set and switch between them.

4
Feature Requests / anomalous diffraction approximation
« on: June 24, 2013, 03:52:44 AM »
Hi, im currently using PhotoScan to do some underwater modeling. Is there anyway to incorporate
anomalous diffraction approximation and attenuation fields if we have a calibrated camera model?

5
Feature Requests / Face Works (nvidia)
« on: March 23, 2013, 06:26:13 AM »
I know the devs are partial to OpenCL for its cross platform compatibility, but nvidia has a new technology that could potentially alleviate much of the bottleneck associated with very large mesh models.

http://youtu.be/5d1ZOYU4gpo

6
Feature Requests / support for frame imagery
« on: February 27, 2013, 06:44:12 PM »
Is there any chance we could get support for interior/exterior camera orientations such as fiducial alignment marks? I use socet set/gxp to process these types of older aerial imagery, though its a rigorous process that involves mandatory camera calibration reports which arn't necessarily always available. I have a few sets of extremely high resolution scans of frame imagery from the 50s-80s that is missing calibration reports. I know the film dimensions but not the cam cal info which is why it would be nice to use photoscan being that it can approximate this info.

Pages: [1]