Messages

1

Bug Reports / Re: Cannot place markers when using fiducials in ver. 1.4.0 build 5420

« on: April 10, 2018, 02:11:16 PM »

Hi Erik,

thanks for the very quick answer,

I'm don't know how to do this automatic calibration using the fiducials. Is it an optimize in the reference panel? Is it a right click on the images in the calibration panel and a "calibrate fiducials"?

More generally, is there a documentation on this workflow?

Jules

2

Bug Reports / Re: Cannot place markers when using fiducials in ver. 1.4.0 build 5420

« on: April 10, 2018, 11:17:41 AM »

Hi,
I'm struggling to use the fiducials for aerial photos calibration.
I could input the coordinate in the calibration menu, then locate them on the photos. But optimize don't give good result.

Probably it's not the good workflow.
Could you give a workflow on how to correctly use fiducials for an aerial picture project?

cheers,
jules

3

General / Re: GPU not detected on Linux

« on: March 22, 2017, 08:47:03 PM »

Great, the solution was in the thread. I had to download the AMDGPU-PRO driver (which was tricky for a while because the download was not working properly... I had to try several times).

Thanks Alexey and jlavi for your quick and efficient replies!

here is the new log to be sure it works properly now:

2017-03-22 20:30:59 Agisoft PhotoScan Professional Version: 1.3.0 build 3772 (64 bit)
2017-03-22 20:30:59 Platform: Linux
2017-03-22 20:30:59 OpenGL Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
2017-03-22 20:30:59 OpenGL Renderer: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
2017-03-22 20:30:59 OpenGL Version: 4.5.13468 Compatibility Profile Context 16.60.3
2017-03-22 20:30:59 Maximum Texture Size: 16384
2017-03-22 20:30:59 Quad Buffered Stereo: not enabled
2017-03-22 20:30:59 ARB_vertex_buffer_object: supported
2017-03-22 20:30:59 ARB_texture_non_power_of_two: supported

regards,
Jules

4

General / GPU not detected on Linux

« on: March 21, 2017, 07:09:48 PM »

Hi,

my graphic card GPU is not anymore supported on photoscan on Linux.

Here is the message log when I try to activate OpenCL device :


2017-03-21 17:02:29 Agisoft PhotoScan Version: 1.2.6 build 2834 (64 bit)
2017-03-21 17:02:29 OpenGL Vendor: X.Org
2017-03-21 17:02:29 OpenGL Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on AMD HAWAII (DRM 2.43.0 / 4.4.0-67-generic, LLVM 3.8.0)
2017-03-21 17:02:29 OpenGL Version: 3.0 Mesa 12.0.6
2017-03-21 17:02:29 Maximum Texture Size: 16384
2017-03-21 17:02:29 Quad Buffered Stereo: not enabled
2017-03-21 17:02:29 ARB_vertex_buffer_object: supported
2017-03-21 17:02:29 ARB_texture_non_power_of_two: supported
2017-03-21 17:02:36 Can't load OpenCL library
>>>

Should I load a specific driver or is there any workaround?

regards,
Jules

5

General / Re: UAV compact camera

« on: November 17, 2015, 08:13:17 PM »

Hello,

not exactly in the topic but I'm looking for an hybrid full frame camera for my UAVs.
I think of the Sony A7 or A7R. Does anyone know if the very high resolution of the latest (36Mpix) causes problem with drone vibrations?

Thanks,
Jules

6

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 16, 2013, 06:23:07 PM »

Hello Alexey,

just to inform you that my problem in building the mesh was due to locale settings. I had french locale numeric wich implied a mess in the coordinates and then in the BBox.

Thanks for you support,

regards

Hello Jules,

I've managed to reproduce such behavior for Arbitrary and Height Field, but I've just moved Bounding Box away from dense cloud. Could you please check one again, that working volume is defined correctly and there is at least part of dense cloud inside the box.

7

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 11, 2013, 05:30:21 PM »

Alexey,

yes I'm sure of the bounding box, sorry about it.

Hello Jules,

I've managed to reproduce such behavior for Arbitrary and Height Field, but I've just moved Bounding Box away from dense cloud. Could you please check one again, that working volume is defined correctly and there is at least part of dense cloud inside the box.

8

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 10, 2013, 07:02:05 PM »

Hello Alexey,

I have tried any combination of parameters. but here is a snapshot of the standard parameters and the error message.

to complete my post, if I choose Height Field instead of Arbitrary then I have no error message but I get an empty model.

9

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 09, 2013, 05:07:19 PM »

as the problem is generic, I can send you any project.
link to the sample monument project :
https://upload.osupytheas.fr/qpv5fo41

10

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 09, 2013, 04:09:38 PM »

here is the log file, the bounding box looks OK.

11

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release

« on: September 09, 2013, 01:59:07 PM »

Using Build 1742 on a Linux Station 64 bits, I can't produce a mesh using the dense cloud as input data. I keep getting an error message "Can't build model".
This happens whatever project  is used.

the procedure I use is the following :
1- align photos
2- build dense cloud
3- try to mesh dense cloud.

12

General / Re: Pleiades jp2 images

« on: September 06, 2013, 05:52:51 PM »

Thanks Alexey for the information, even if it's bad news as it's indeed a pushbroom image.

regards,

13

General / Pleiades jp2 images

« on: September 05, 2013, 12:26:33 PM »

Hello,

I'm trying to test Pleiades satellites images (panchro 0.5m) in jp2 format which is not recognized by default. These images are very big (~700Mb) in this compressed format.

What would be better to user such images in Photoscan? Convert to another format would lead to even bigger file, and clipping images is not recommended as I read.

Jules