Hello Guys
A while ago, I did some testing with Agisoft using a macro lens low cost in my Canon 60D to shoot a seed CASHEW (fruit typical of Brazil), the object in question here does not have more than 4 cm in size, an object too small to photograph without using a lens adapted to it. Below the used adapter Macro.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RAYNOX-DCR-250-Super-Macro-Conversion-CLOSE-UP-LENS-52mm-55mm-58mm-67mm-map-/130741876563?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item1e70d2b753Whereas photographed using only one camera and circling the objects, just to experiment, I was amazed with the result .
http://d.pr/i/tol1http://d.pr/i/yrihttp://d.pr/i/YrrKhttp://d.pr/i/n43Ohttp://d.pr/i/YrN6The results are far to apply for work, and is difficult to control focus also, as today we have a RIG of 13 cameras, I'm tempted to invest in new adapters for lens for these cameras, so you can use to capture small models, as for example strawberries.
And here the angle that the photos were taken:
http://d.pr/i/A5qzMy question is if I invest in a better lens, is it really going to achieve satisfactory results after this investment, considering that 13 macro lens good quality, can cost a lot of money.
Anyone here ever had a similar experience, and like to share?
All the best
Jean Campos