Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - JesperChristensen

Pages: [1]
1
General / Re: Validate invalid matches
« on: September 04, 2020, 01:01:06 PM »
Thanks for the reply.

What I found this morning is similar to what you have described. I moved all unaligned images to new chunk, ran the aligment again, move unaligned to new chunk, align, and repeat. That way, I actually got all images aligned. But it seems that Agisoft, in a large chunk, only aligns one part, meaning that even though, say image 2-10 aligns well, and 50-60 aligns well, it will only do one coherent set instead of "spotty" alignment, which for my use case would also be ok.

So the work as is, to keep moving unligned cameras into new chunks, redo the alignment and repeat until all images are aligned. I guess then I manually have to "stitch" together the mosaics in the end or simply provide several chunks of mosaics. But that's much better than only having 10 images out of 550 aligned  ::) ::)

2
General / Re: Validate invalid matches
« on: September 04, 2020, 11:24:00 AM »
Could I try bumping this up? Is there really no way to go about this? So sad the matches look solid, but are not used due to some threshold somewhere. It must be possible to change this?

3
General / Validate invalid matches
« on: September 01, 2020, 07:11:42 PM »
I have got a bunch of underwater sequential photographies, which basically just needs stiching based on sequential reference. However out of 550 images, only 11 are aligned. When I look at the matches for an image, many many features are matched correctly, see attached image.

This holds true for my entire dataset, but I cannot in any possible way get Metashape to do a good job.

Is there any way that I can manually validate the matches that are found, but not used?

4
General / Alignment errors
« on: May 21, 2019, 04:40:54 PM »
I have a sequence of images from a line with more than 80% overlap. I have very high accuracy in the positions of each image along with yaw, pitch and roll.
I have included everything as a reference for the images in the model, but when it aligns it can only align a very small fraction of the images and in these it completely alters the position of images (almost upside down/rolled).

Does anybody have a clue as to why this is?

5
General / Use camera positions embedded in the image information
« on: January 07, 2019, 03:21:24 PM »
I am fairly new to PhotoScan and I am running in to some undesired behavior.

Background:
We use PhotoScan to generate Orthomosaics of images taken of the seabed underwater with autonomous underwater vehicles. For each image the position and altitude is embedded and the navigation accuracy of our vehicle is extremely accurate, so the task should be as simple as "overlaying" the images. I have more than 90% overlap in each image and good detailed conditions.

Current situation:
When I try to align a set of images it first of all takes almost an hour for less than 300 images. Next up the alignment process completely skews the image positions, puts them at different altitudes, rotations and positions. I do not understand why this is even possible when all needed information regarding positions of the images is already embedded in the images.
See the two included images for reference.

I hope someone has the expertise to help me with this.

Pages: [1]