1
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 28, 2013, 03:56:17 PM »
hi all
what is new in build 1750? any changes to ortho rendering?
GR
what is new in build 1750? any changes to ortho rendering?
GR
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General / Re: GIS Sputnik - PhotoScan Compatible 3D Geobrowser
« on: October 10, 2013, 03:14:44 PM »
Actually LAS format seems to be a light weight solution and more common.
When it comes to measurements at Point cloud it has much in common with Elevation profile in Google Earth. Well you might have seen it also in ArcMap (ESRI). Very-very useful thing.
When it comes to measurements at Point cloud it has much in common with Elevation profile in Google Earth. Well you might have seen it also in ArcMap (ESRI). Very-very useful thing.
3
General / Re: GIS Sputnik - PhotoScan Compatible 3D Geobrowser
« on: October 09, 2013, 02:47:28 PM »
hello guys,
is it possible to visualize a 3D model as a dense point cloud at your system?
Now it is mesh only whereas a point cloud (from visual point of view) looks much better and btw also gives an opportunity to measure heights
George
is it possible to visualize a 3D model as a dense point cloud at your system?
Now it is mesh only whereas a point cloud (from visual point of view) looks much better and btw also gives an opportunity to measure heights
George
4
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 09, 2013, 11:37:55 AM »
one more question ...
is it possible to reorient model but not in a manual way?
is it possible to reorient model but not in a manual way?
5
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 09, 2013, 08:48:49 AM »
would that be enough to make the model scaled i.e. to be able to obtain dimensional features from it?
6
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 07, 2013, 03:03:42 PM »
Hello guys,
is it still possible to set up a reference distance in a scene with Pscan?
example attached
GR
is it still possible to set up a reference distance in a scene with Pscan?
example attached
GR
8
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: September 06, 2013, 04:23:55 PM »
delighted by this version
see attached:
all surfaces
ground
Almost like a LIDAR (not exactly but still very good move towards)
Please-please guys - resolve the ghost effect
Cheers
see attached:
all surfaces
ground
Almost like a LIDAR (not exactly but still very good move towards)
Please-please guys - resolve the ghost effect
Cheers
9
General / Re: Computational power
« on: September 04, 2013, 03:56:10 PM »
Was it RAW format?
What applications are you basically after?
What applications are you basically after?
10
General / Re: Computational power
« on: September 04, 2013, 01:32:56 PM »
where do you get 24MP images from Oli?
how they perform with Point cloud rendering? Lossless or noisy or ...
how they perform with Point cloud rendering? Lossless or noisy or ...
11
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: September 02, 2013, 04:46:24 PM »
finally made a brief test
seems like classified Dense point cloud and corresponding options for mesh generation etc. are fantastic features.
I've tested PS 1.0.0 at my latest dataset covering 450 ha of a forested area (2500 images) and generated DTM (quasi one) from DPC; and I compared the result with official DTM (produced based on LIDAR of just 15 cm accuracy). What I have got is very "little" relative difference. Not exceeding 1,5 meters (an average is around 1 meter) at more or less sparse forest and less than 0,2-0,3 meters at open areas. When it comes to a dense forest there are still issues but looks promissing. Dense forest is actually never easy surface. But guys this is 450 ha or 4,5 sq.km - quite a large surface tho.
seems like classified Dense point cloud and corresponding options for mesh generation etc. are fantastic features.
I've tested PS 1.0.0 at my latest dataset covering 450 ha of a forested area (2500 images) and generated DTM (quasi one) from DPC; and I compared the result with official DTM (produced based on LIDAR of just 15 cm accuracy). What I have got is very "little" relative difference. Not exceeding 1,5 meters (an average is around 1 meter) at more or less sparse forest and less than 0,2-0,3 meters at open areas. When it comes to a dense forest there are still issues but looks promissing. Dense forest is actually never easy surface. But guys this is 450 ha or 4,5 sq.km - quite a large surface tho.
12
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: September 02, 2013, 03:58:09 PM »
aha! got it!
but how can I select? With the common tool kit in the upper ribbon, right?
but how can I select? With the common tool kit in the upper ribbon, right?
13
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: September 02, 2013, 03:47:22 PM »
seems like "Assign class" has not been activated yet ...
14
General / Computational power
« on: September 02, 2013, 09:36:25 AM »
Hello guys!
I know that this issue has been well discussed so far. However, time runs and there could be some changes.
I still wonder what could be the best solution for Pscan hardware? Say no limitations with resourses (at reasonable level indeed).
In simple terms what is the best computer to use Pscan?
What is the main feature that influences its performance? RAM, graphic card, CPU, hard drive type etc.?
Has anyone implemented a cluster solution?
Appreciate all ideas.
Cheers
I know that this issue has been well discussed so far. However, time runs and there could be some changes.
I still wonder what could be the best solution for Pscan hardware? Say no limitations with resourses (at reasonable level indeed).
In simple terms what is the best computer to use Pscan?
What is the main feature that influences its performance? RAM, graphic card, CPU, hard drive type etc.?
Has anyone implemented a cluster solution?
Appreciate all ideas.
Cheers
15
General / Re: Trouble aligning, ower water
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:10:03 PM »
Ah! Forgot ... Forget about aligning the images it is almost impossible water doesn't contain no points to hook on
