Messages

1

Feature Requests / Generating a high Normal/Depth map on low geo

« on: September 11, 2013, 07:50:40 PM »

It seems for contiguous contours generating a model on low gives fantastic results.  Decimate that down and generate a high or ultra quality model to use with xNormal to create a nice normal map for the lower res model.

Couldn't this be done as a texture average/projection similar to the way you generate the color textures?  If this isn't a possibility in your mind then could we have the option to mass export the undistorted version of all of the depth maps and normals in a project?  Along with that we would obviously need the separate "build depth" option back.  Then I could just manually project the normal maps I want to use. 

Thoughts?

2

General / Re: Noise (I assume) and what to do with it

« on: March 26, 2013, 06:53:29 AM »

Do the initial alignment, export the cameras xml and force your camera's calibration that was calculated.  Run your photo sequence through neat video (the most amazing degrainer available) and render it with the same naming/numbering convention as imported.  Swap the folders so Photoscan opens the degrain sequence instead.  Import the Cameras xml and resolve.  I've gotten double the points with this process on numerous occasions.

3

Feature Requests / Re: Ultra high normal map on lower res model

« on: March 26, 2013, 06:44:44 AM »

Why not both? 

4

Feature Requests / Re: Ultra high normal map on lower res model

« on: March 24, 2013, 06:39:06 PM »

This could also really help making awesome(er?) normals for sets/objects that are recreated manually with basic primitives.  I'm excited if this happens.

5

Feature Requests / Ultra high normal map on lower res model

« on: March 24, 2013, 06:21:34 AM »

My main method for making realistic use of the millions of polygons generated in Photoscan is making a medium ish quality model and combine different normal details with ultra high or high quality subsections of my chunks.  Some of my chunks are hundreds of photos so it can be cumbersome to make use of all of them for their details.  Since build depth allows me to calculate the normals on ultra high without crashing from RAM overload I can make use of them in other ways like manually projecting/painting the normals from the generated camera's angles.

Would it be possible to have normal generation similar to texture generation if you precalculate the depth of the images used?

Thank you!
G

6

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release

« on: March 24, 2013, 06:08:29 AM »

Export depth seems to be broken in 1647.  Also, it would be nice to be able to export all of the selected depth images instead of having to do them individually.

G

7

Feature Requests / Re: Multiple 3D Models per Chunk

« on: March 24, 2013, 06:06:46 AM »

Export depth seems to be broken in 1647.  Also...could the option export all of the selected depths instead of just one?

Thank you for being such an awesome company.

8

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release

« on: March 05, 2013, 03:03:04 PM »

Beautiful. Thank you!

9

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release

« on: March 05, 2013, 02:21:07 PM »

The 64 bit Windows version seems to be broken.  The installer won't launch at all for me.

Windows 7 x64

10

Feature Requests / Re: Cosmetics..

« on: December 03, 2012, 08:19:46 AM »

Or be able to hop through all of the camera perspectives. 

11

Feature Requests / Re: Exif transfer tool with image sequence replacement

« on: December 03, 2012, 05:41:36 AM »

It not only solved more cameras but the geometry looks way better.  Thank you so much.  Your program is awesome!

Graham

12

Feature Requests / Re: Extremely large projects 1000+ photos

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:58:57 PM »

I'm teeming with anticipation for the implementation of all of this.

13

Feature Requests / Re: Exif transfer tool with image sequence replacement

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:33:34 PM »

Sweet!  Then I did it right.  I'm calculating it now so I'll compare the results with the calculation I did previously with the normal images.

You rock!
Graham

14

Feature Requests / Re: Exif transfer tool with image sequence replacement

« on: December 02, 2012, 10:15:14 PM »

This method doesn't seem to transfer the exif data.  I'm assuming not having the lens etc would mess up the alignment...

Is there any other solution or am I doing it wrong?

Thank you,
Graham

15

Feature Requests / Re: Exif transfer tool with image sequence replacement

« on: December 02, 2012, 09:49:54 PM »

This sounds neat.  Be back with the joyous results!

Thank you!
Graham