Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - rival29

Pages: [1]
1
Why dont you filter by confidense, then select all the remaining points and assign then a class. After you reset your filter you can still see all the points, however during DEM or Ortho construction you can delegate which class to base the products off...i do it all the time

2
Feature Requests / Gradual Selection (visualized)
« on: April 14, 2016, 06:53:32 PM »
ok, gradual selection is key in optimizing camera alignment. Is there any way to integrate some sort of graph that shows the gaussian distribution of reprojection errors? The slider works fine, but its tough to find the mean reprojection error this way. Something similar to cloudcompares integration would be ideal with the colorful chart that tells you the percentage of errors per dataset.

3
General / Re: Remote Desktop and OpenCL
« on: October 23, 2013, 08:25:27 AM »
Sam, try using chrome with the chrome remote desktop extension. It works beautifully. It uses a VP8 codec to stream a live video feed of the remote computer. The advantage to this method is that you system will behave normally, video cards will be initialized normally as well as OpenCL. However, other people can see what your doing on the remote screen. So turn the monitors off if you want privacy still.

4
General / OpenCL co-processors
« on: October 18, 2013, 06:17:26 PM »
I was curious if anyone has tried or uses Xeon Phi or Tesla co-processors with Photoscan Pro

5
Bug Reports / Mask Behavior
« on: July 31, 2013, 07:30:57 PM »
So Im not sure if this is an isolated occurrence, but it seems to do it to me on multiple projects. Projects involve high altitude aerial imagery of a Hawaiian coastline. Since the ocean surface is moving and creates dynamic lighting effects, i use masks to exclude these regions from image alignment. This is done in photoshop using the intelligence selection tool which is much faster than using the included photoscan mask tools. in each photo, a new alpha channel is created from the selection and the image is saved as a tiff. Photoscan is able to import the masks using this procedure fine. The masks photo view shows water covered regions in black while the areas of modeling interest are shown in white. All my control points are in place, images are aligned and the point cloud is optimized. since i don't really care about building a mesh, i usually just select all the photos and click build depth. this works fine as well. After i have depth maps i have the option of exporting a DEM. here is where i run into problems, if i export a DEM or and orthomosaic without resetting the masks for all the images, the DEM and ortho are clipped inversely to how they are being used. By this i mean that the masks work fine for image alignment by excluding the regions i don't want, i can tell because the point cloud model of the alignment points have no trace of points in ocean regions, but when exporting DEM or orthomosaic the masks seem to be working inversely. I can work around this by resetting the masks for the entire group of photos, and then exporting, however if i need to do any last minute optimizations or realignments, i have to re-import the masks or create an inverted set and switch between them.

6
Feature Requests / anomalous diffraction approximation
« on: June 24, 2013, 03:52:44 AM »
Hi, im currently using PhotoScan to do some underwater modeling. Is there anyway to incorporate
anomalous diffraction approximation and attenuation fields if we have a calibrated camera model?

7
Feature Requests / Face Works (nvidia)
« on: March 23, 2013, 06:26:13 AM »
I know the devs are partial to OpenCL for its cross platform compatibility, but nvidia has a new technology that could potentially alleviate much of the bottleneck associated with very large mesh models.

http://youtu.be/5d1ZOYU4gpo

8
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release
« on: March 23, 2013, 05:49:18 AM »
Not sure where to suggest features, but this FaceWorks demo by nVidia could potentially improve huge mesh rendering.

http://youtu.be/5d1ZOYU4gpo

10
Feature Requests / Re: Nice to have features
« on: February 27, 2013, 06:48:43 PM »
i agree, decimation based on a some defining parameters such as avg point spacing, etc. would be useful. Currently I have to export a point cloud, decimate to avg spacing and mesh in cloud compare. It would be convenient to do this all in PS.

11
Feature Requests / support for frame imagery
« on: February 27, 2013, 06:44:12 PM »
Is there any chance we could get support for interior/exterior camera orientations such as fiducial alignment marks? I use socet set/gxp to process these types of older aerial imagery, though its a rigorous process that involves mandatory camera calibration reports which arn't necessarily always available. I have a few sets of extremely high resolution scans of frame imagery from the 50s-80s that is missing calibration reports. I know the film dimensions but not the cam cal info which is why it would be nice to use photoscan being that it can approximate this info.

12
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release
« on: February 23, 2013, 08:41:06 PM »
I currently have two Quadro 5000 cards that came installed with the machine. Each has 2gb vram, non-SLI mode. To my understanding SLI wouldn't help since each card would load the same data. When reconstructing depth each seems to be fully utilized as individual computer clusters. Even at 40mil faces it is difficult to work with. If i can get my hands on a Titan ill definitely post some benchmarks. I use cloudcompare to work with the pointclouds, and have tried i-site studio 4 as well but both seem to hit the VRAM wall with large datasets...

Anyone know any good pointcloud analysis software that uses octrees for visual display?

13
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 0.9.1 pre-release
« on: February 23, 2013, 02:03:15 AM »
I'm glad to see improvments in the production of orthoimagery. using 0.9.1 build 1632 64-bit I revisited an old project to see if there were improvements in the orthomosaic function. Without reprocessing geometry or camera alignment I generated a new orthoimage. I had hoped the bug preventing masked regions from being output in mosaic mode would have been fixed. Doesn't look like the case, but it does appear that there is a fair amount of color correction taking place. These two captures show the differences in color corrective output between v 0.9.0 (1584) and v 0.9.1 (1632), it seems like there was heavy balancing done on the blue channel. This is nice and all but the masking bug really limits the aesthetic quality of the orthomosaic.

Also, i have been running into issues with limitations in VRAM of my Quadro 5000. Im running a dell Precision T7600 with dual octocore xeon E5-2687W cpus at 3.1ghz, 128gb ECC DDR3, 8 TB RAID. I usually have no issues with processing of large image sets but i run into performance problems trying to display meshed models consisting over more than 40 million faces. It appears that the VRAM fills up and brings the machine to its knees. Is there any way of more efficiently displaying large meshes or should i considered trading this card in for a Geforce Titan 6GB?





Pages: [1]