16
General / Re: Some tutorials in Spanish
« on: March 14, 2016, 06:09:32 PM »
muchisimas gracias hasta luego
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
muchisimas gracias hasta luego
17
General / Re: Surface roughness and low resolution
« on: August 26, 2015, 10:13:49 AM »
Hi prime,
have you try with an object not replective like this? I think that the problem are due to the reflections.
have you try with an object not replective like this? I think that the problem are due to the reflections.
19
General / Re: filtering and delete point of the scan
« on: January 19, 2015, 02:00:50 PM »
Hi Karsten,
yes it is. I have some noise black of background that cannot filter.
It will be really useful a color filter of the point (with some % tollerance of color)
Thanks for the info
yes it is. I have some noise black of background that cannot filter.
It will be really useful a color filter of the point (with some % tollerance of color)
Thanks for the info
20
General / Re: filtering and delete point of the scan
« on: January 16, 2015, 11:15:16 AM »
So, as I can see there is no way... :-(
21
General / filtering and delete point of the scan
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:15:24 AM »
Hi,
I'm searching the simplest way to filtering and delete a ponit of the scan.
I have many black point to eliminate from the model scan. Is there any possibilities in PS?
Thanks in advance
I'm searching the simplest way to filtering and delete a ponit of the scan.
I have many black point to eliminate from the model scan. Is there any possibilities in PS?
Thanks in advance
23
Bug Reports / Re: Why textures exported in PNG are different from JPG format?
« on: August 27, 2014, 12:17:08 PM »
Many thanks Alexey!
24
Bug Reports / Why textures exported in PNG are different from JPG format?
« on: August 27, 2014, 10:41:26 AM »
Hi to all,
I have exported an OBJ with PNG textures and the model (an archaeological structure) have the surface textures "cracked" with thin grey lines...
After a control I have exported the same textures in JPG format and all is good in the final model...
If I compare the same textures, in the PNG format are pieces in a white background, and the JPG textures are connected with a colored shade background.
Why this difference?
I have exported an OBJ with PNG textures and the model (an archaeological structure) have the surface textures "cracked" with thin grey lines...
After a control I have exported the same textures in JPG format and all is good in the final model...
If I compare the same textures, in the PNG format are pieces in a white background, and the JPG textures are connected with a colored shade background.
Why this difference?
25
General / Re: Newbe question: difference between Standard and Pro edition
« on: June 19, 2014, 10:16:37 AM »
Thanks for the answer.
Due to the hi difference in price between the versions Standard and Pro I'll try to work with meshlab to adjust the mesh as suggested.
I hope to find the right way.
All my best
Due to the hi difference in price between the versions Standard and Pro I'll try to work with meshlab to adjust the mesh as suggested.
I hope to find the right way.
All my best
26
General / Newbe question: difference between Standard and Pro edition
« on: June 18, 2014, 09:42:36 AM »
Hi to all,
excuse me for the "basic" question.
I have a Standard edition and I'm involved in archaeological reconstruction.
My question is about:
- alignement of cameras/chunk
- refinement of the surfaces of the mesh
- exporting with metric reference in PDF
in Standard edition I have encountered some problem when change light in a tunnel of excavation and the chunk cannot be aligned corectly.
With some ceramic piece I have problem due to the irregular mesh (rough) reconstructed
In PDF of the textured model I would like to have a metric reference with the model.
Is a limitation of the Standard edition or is the same in the Pro too?
many thanks in advace for the answers.
all my best
excuse me for the "basic" question.
I have a Standard edition and I'm involved in archaeological reconstruction.
My question is about:
- alignement of cameras/chunk
- refinement of the surfaces of the mesh
- exporting with metric reference in PDF
in Standard edition I have encountered some problem when change light in a tunnel of excavation and the chunk cannot be aligned corectly.
With some ceramic piece I have problem due to the irregular mesh (rough) reconstructed
In PDF of the textured model I would like to have a metric reference with the model.
Is a limitation of the Standard edition or is the same in the Pro too?
many thanks in advace for the answers.
all my best
27
Feature Requests / Re: Photoscan Professional "Artist" Edition
« on: June 04, 2014, 10:06:47 AM »
I totally agree with chadfx.
28
Feature Requests / Re: Photoscan Professional "Artist" Edition
« on: June 03, 2014, 04:20:57 PM »
29
Feature Requests / Re: Photoscan Professional "Artist" Edition
« on: May 29, 2014, 09:58:36 AM »
...and after more than a month of suggestion...? an official answer will be really apreciated from the Agisoft stuff...
thanks in advance
thanks in advance
