Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mwittnebel

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
General / Re: Wikipedia for Agisoft Photoscan
« on: January 13, 2015, 04:19:40 PM »
Alexey is it possible, to create a wiki for Agisoft in the future? What do you think about it ?

32
General / Wikipedia for Agisoft Photoscan
« on: January 09, 2015, 01:22:55 PM »
My idea is that Agisoft could create a wiki what the community and Agisoft could fill with useful information.

What do you think ?

33
General / RGB and NIR
« on: November 19, 2014, 05:39:37 PM »
I have a general question.

is it possible to use the NIR and RGB images from one flight in the same chunk to calculate the geometry(also alignment) and then for the texture use on time only the rgb images and the other time the NIR images.

- NIR and RGB Cam has the same sensor and the same amount of pixels.


Is this possible with Agisoft ? I thing that the matching of the NIR and RGB end product should be better match, among each other.

Best Regards Marcus
thanks for you time

34
General / Re: DEM calculation changes ?
« on: November 13, 2014, 02:41:58 PM »
worked  8)

35
General / DEM calculation changes ?
« on: November 12, 2014, 12:55:36 PM »
Old Version: 1.0.4 build 1847
New Version: 1.1.0 build 1982

We have calculated a project with high settings for the DEM ...

In the past, was the resolution of the DEM 2 times bigger then the row pixel size.
Now the pixel size is 4 times bigger then the pow image pixel size.

Could we change something to get the old resolution ?

36
Agisoft Viewer / Re: AgiSoft Viewer
« on: October 23, 2014, 07:44:34 PM »
Hello Alexey,

I think this exporting needs a lot of RAM.

My 32 GB of ram were already full, for the 190 Images(i canceled my last try). now i have increased the resolution from 5 cm to 1m.

I think i am not really able to export a normal product of 800 - 1600 images. (with this ram consumption)
Is there some further improvements planed ?


best regards Marcus

37
Agisoft Viewer / Re: AgiSoft Viewer
« on: October 23, 2014, 05:13:26 PM »
Is it normal that the exporting of "Agisoft Viewer format" needs a long time ?

I need ~ 3.5hours to export a project with 190 images (12MP per Image).

38
Agisoft Viewer / Re: AgiSoft Viewer
« on: October 23, 2014, 03:36:43 PM »
It would be very nice if the viewer has also an standalone installer
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░█░░░█░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░█░░░░█░░░░░░░░
███████▄▄█░░░░░██████▄░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░
▓▓▓▓▓▓█████░░░░░░░░░█░░
██████▀░░░░▀▀██████▀░░░

39
General / Re: i7 4820K or Dual Xeon E5-2630 v2 or Xeon E5-1650 v2 ?
« on: October 23, 2014, 11:23:35 AM »
Dear Exhale,

We have for example a i7 3930K with a clock speed of 4.2GHz(slightly overclocked) and the CPU is running ...(temperature is under 70°C) The performance is like a mid range Xeon but costs only ~550€. On disadvantage is the ram limitation of 64GB ram. If you don't need more than 64GB ram for your processing than the 3930K,4930K,5930K is maybe an alternative for you.

40
General / Re: GPU Use
« on: October 23, 2014, 11:07:01 AM »
Do you have a agisoft logfile ? maybe the software has deactivated the GPU because of driver problems.

41
General / Re: New Nvidia GTX cards
« on: October 15, 2014, 12:45:14 PM »
I think, the 980 is a better choice. (If this card is working in PS;) )

The power consumption is reduced by 50Watt in comparison to the 780 and you have more processing power.

great card ..... i want also 2 of them  8)

42
General / Re: improve performance?
« on: September 11, 2014, 01:19:02 PM »
You could add the Geforce gtx 680 into your system and calculate with both.
I personally like for the calculation more the ATI cards.

43
General / Re: CPU & GPU temperatures
« on: September 11, 2014, 01:15:59 PM »
I think, for a notebook it's normal.
If the CPU goes to high, than it will reduce the processing speed.
If you need a mobile solution for processing than look to a gaming Notebook with improved cooling.

You could reduce you CPU temperature maybe with something like this:
https://www.google.de/search?q=notebook+cooler&biw=1920&bih=1042&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=GnYRVK_rIYOGywOc14LYAg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ

44
General / Hardware/Processing optimization
« on: July 25, 2014, 11:10:46 AM »
Hello everybody,

I have some questions to optimizing our hardware configuration for the next processing machine.
First of all i post all of my hardware and Software components:

Hardware
CPU: i7 3930K with 4.2GHz (42x100)
RAM: 32GB (4x8GB DDR3 1600 Kingston CL11) (max load normally between 20-30GB)
GPU: 2x R9 R290
Storage: 1SSD & 1HDD


Software
OS: Win 7 Ultimate (updated)
PhotoScan Pro: 1.0.4 build 1847 (64bit) - 0/12 CPU (Dense Cloud)
Catalyst Version 14.4
Driver Packaging Version: 14.10.1006-140417a-171099C



Now my questions.
Is it possible to increase the load for the GPUs in the "Dense Cloud reconstruction" step ?
In this step is the CPU load on 50-70% and the load for the GPU is very irregular 0-100%.

Also on some steps the CPU load is very disappointing(under 80%) especially if ram usage is increasing or decreasing. I will add a load graph of my system in the future to visualize my request.
Is there a bottleneck in my hardware setup or is this a software related problem ?
I would like to get the optimal load on my system to get the most out of this hardware.( time is money ;) )

Tanks for your attention and i hope we have a good discussion on this topic.

45
General / Re: GPU processing during the modeling and settings
« on: July 11, 2014, 10:06:16 AM »
Is there a possibility that Photoscan could also use GPU for more steps than Build Dense Cloud, in the near future ?

This would be a huge Performance upgrade for the Software.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4