Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - FLuca

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
46
Hi,
It is a good idea to share configurations, as it seems that everybody it developping its own control system.
I have now a rig with 15 canon 600D that works quite fine and I hope will grow with time.

I use smartshooter for camera settings and automatic download of images to the computer.
It works very well but the hard part is to get all cams with stable usb connection to the computer.
As already said in the forum, good cables are required. usb 3 cables have a better screen and allow more length than usb 2 cables.

for the cam triggering I don't use smartshooter because of the delay between cams which increase with each additional cam. it works if you are in an almost black room with the shutter open a very long time (2-5s for 10cams) and trigger manually the flash when you have eard that all mirrors ar up.
possible but not very convenient and very un-confortable for the model that go from full black to big flash lights

instead I have developped a small electronic board piloted by an arduino that drive relays. contacts of relays are wired to the remote control of each camera.
one additional relay is driving the flash remote control. that way it is easy to automatically fire the cam and the flash after a predefined timer (120ms in my case).
connected to the arduino, a wireless remote control from adafruit allow firing from where you want.

with this config I manage to get sync at 1/5s without any black images

the bottleneck is the download of pictures to the computer that takes between 20s and 30s (for 15 pics) even with a SSD. it is a very long time when searching for a nice pose

47
Face and Body Scanning / Re: Mounting cameras to light stands
« on: May 13, 2014, 02:30:21 PM »
Mark,
with the manfrotto super clamp you need to add a spigot  adapter and a basic rotule head
for spigot it is preferable to have a long one (http://www.la-bs.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?Code=MA013) to allow your camera to be more freely oriented
for the rotule you can use the Manfrotto MA492 which doesnt have a removable plate but have a very small footprint allowing to open the battery case without removing the cam
to mouunt the clamp on you can also use the Manfrotto autopoles which can avoid the large space taken by the tripods, three heights are available. they can also be mounted on a tripod if your ceiling is too high
http://www.manfrotto.com/black-autopole-extends-from-210cm-to-370cm

regards

48
General / Re: Accuracy of masking from low/med quality model
« on: April 02, 2014, 03:55:33 PM »
thank you Andrew for the tip !

49
General / Re: Accuracy of masking from low/med quality model
« on: April 01, 2014, 03:45:07 PM »
I don't know how exactly the masks are used by PS, however I have another practical question:

Is there any way to remove the masks ??

I need this function when I generate the masks from the model to perform alignement on model only (especially for aligning chunks). As these masks are really not perfectly fitted to the model, I would like to remove the masks to generate the point cloud. Unfortunately I did not find the function and you can not deactivate the mask in point cloud generation (maybe a feature to add in the 'Build Dense Cloud Panel'?).

50
General / Re: Working with UltraCam multispectral imagery
« on: March 14, 2014, 04:01:40 PM »
Hi Stephano,

Sorry I didn't read well your first post and took the NIR for the normals of the points.
I don't work with multi-band images so I don't know/test if you can export extra value.
For sure the PLY format can handle it, but it only depends on Agisoft to allow exporting all channels.

I hope you find a solution soon

Fred

51
Face and Body Scanning / Re: Manfrotto ball heads
« on: March 13, 2014, 07:15:15 PM »
hi David,

could you please put the corresponding manfrotto reference?

thanks

52
General / Re: Working with UltraCam multispectral imagery
« on: March 12, 2014, 03:26:08 PM »
Stefano,
You can easily export the pointcloud with the PLY export format.
Uncheck the binary option and you will have an ASCII file with the following data for each point:
x y z nx ny nz r g b

If you want to import the point cloud to a generic application as an ASCII file, just remove the PLY header.

I would recommend to use Textpad, which is well adapted for editing large ASCII files.

 

53
General / Re: Artifacts/sparklies in mesh (3dmax)
« on: March 11, 2014, 04:02:29 PM »
Buy a circular polarizer filter for your lens.  It gets rid of specular reflections.  Also shoot RAW and reduce highlights in Lightroom before processing in Photoscan.

Jeff, I understand you are using polarizer filters. I think about buying such filters, but it is quite a big budget with multiple cameras.
Could you please give us some feedback with these filters:
does it change radically the reconscructed model ?
do have noticeable improvements in hairy areas ?
do you have 1 filters on the flash units and 1 on the cams ?

thanks

54
Face and Body Scanning / Re: Face scanner - Prototype
« on: January 20, 2014, 07:14:46 PM »
Brian33433 as an example, I have just started to set up a rig with 6 fixed cam with flash synchronisation
I get nice result for the front face, but the ears and back of the jaws are clearly missing details
I have tried assembling some chunks with photos taken with my head turned side to side but the alignement between chunk was not perfect and I will have to manually remove the gap between chunks as you can see in the attachement
12 cams seems the minimum for the face including ears (only front side of the ears)
good luck with your rig

55
Face and Body Scanning / Re: Face scanner - Prototype
« on: January 10, 2014, 04:13:17 PM »
Nice rig !
On your installation mosaic picture it seems that the scanned person is laying on the floor which gives not very flatering faces with the fleshy parts moving backwards
couldn't you install it on the wall instead ?

56
Feature Requests / Re: points visibility toggling and point overlay
« on: January 10, 2014, 04:04:46 PM »
Yes, having the image superimposed to the points when using the Look Through function would help deciding if the image should be realigned or even discarded, as you can on other photogrametry software such as photomodeler.


57
General / Re: Why Quadro s are not good for Agisoft
« on: December 06, 2013, 05:41:39 PM »
Hi,
After trying photoscan on game card (GTX285) and pro card (quadro 4000), i would definitely go for the pro card on my next configuration.
I haven't being able to compare performances cause the CPU and memory are not the same, but my GTX cards goes up very fast to high temperature (100°C) when the GPU is 100% used, while quadro is almost no affected and remains around 60°C.
With such high temperatures, it happens very often to crash the nvidia driver and even the computer.
Regards
Fred

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]