Messages

16

Bug Reports / Re: Import reference data in other coordinate system than WGS84 fails.

« on: August 02, 2016, 11:06:52 PM »

yes, JPG's are tagged with WGS84.
I would expect the .csv import dialog, which asks for coordinate system, to convert as needed once indicated an incompatible system.  - you could do that

on an related matter - please answer http://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=5679.0 
Thank you,

17

Bug Reports / Re: Import reference data in other coordinate system than WGS84 fails.

« on: August 02, 2016, 04:28:42 PM »

11,595269.241,7713834.723,38.888
12,595667.803,7713703.429,50.052
13,595265.431,7713576.524,53.329
13b,595277.185,7713572.551,54.214
14,595052.570,7713358.175,64.187
15,595326.465,7713361.184,67.023

Importing after photos are aligned and dense cloud.

18

Bug Reports / Import reference data in other coordinate system than WGS84 fails.

« on: August 02, 2016, 03:10:10 PM »

If I add a csv containing EPSG::25833 markers ,selecting in the import dialog that coordinate system, it will show up in the marker list, but *no* markers will be in the map correct area.

If I convert the .csv markers to ESPG::4326, using gdaltransform, then import it as EPSG::4326  - it'll work properly.

Somehow, "Import CSV" dialog - does not really treat the coordinates as EPSG::25833.

19

General / Which steps in workflow needs to be re-done after adding GCP's ?

« on: August 02, 2016, 03:03:33 PM »

I have rendered some maps.
Then added more GCP's. (and placed them in photos)

-which steps in the workflow need to be redone ?

20

General / Q about multi-level flights.

« on: June 27, 2016, 12:03:00 AM »

Imagine a dataset consisting of photos with 60% overlap,  *and* photos with barely any overlap,(lower altitude).

Question: Will the closer to the ground photos still be used to give good details because they can be aligned using the higher-altitude photos ?   - will the map be better ?
 

21

General / Question about adding GCP to an "completed"

« on: June 26, 2016, 11:59:13 PM »

I have made some maps w/o GCP  - now I got GCP's.
how far back in the workflow do I need to go (what to repeat), in order to properly render it with GCP ?
 

22

General / Re: Where to store Roll Pitch Yaw data in EXIF for import into PS

« on: May 17, 2016, 03:43:36 PM »

Thank you.
The reason I am asking, is not to save processing power, it's because I had some flights in very strong winds where plane had to crosstrack at 70degree yaw to keep the planned pattern.
Of course, that reduced overlap significantly,  and resulted in a bunch of holes.

(the photos were aligned by reference)

Do you know wherever adding yaw data would help at all, or an modified/different method of alignment would better find matching points ?

23

General / Re: Where to store Roll Pitch Yaw data in EXIF for import into PS

« on: May 17, 2016, 02:16:40 PM »

Yes, I just hoped you invented some names, that were read if existing.
That would save a step.
Is there an example script that does it ?

24

General / Re: Where to store Roll Pitch Yaw data in EXIF for import into PS

« on: May 17, 2016, 02:04:13 PM »

So, pitch, roll, yaw is not imported automatically from exif when adding photos, an script is needed ?

25

General / Re: Where to store Roll Pitch Yaw data in EXIF for import into PS

« on: May 16, 2016, 11:46:46 PM »

please post a properly geotagged photo (with pitch/roll/yaw )   - as I had no success finding the exif tags Photoscan pro is  reading to get those values.

26

Feature Requests / Please post application icon.

« on: April 19, 2016, 11:13:11 PM »

The application does have an icon, but please post a .svg , .png or other icon , and make it a standard part of the linux package,  That would make it easier adding a nice shortcut to the application.

27

Feature Requests / Re: Please make batch processing display time spent per step

« on: April 19, 2016, 04:12:14 PM »

yes, please - so that one can see how long each step took.

28

Bug Reports / Re: Processed a map, but unable to export to tiff/bigtiff (PhotoScanPro1.2.4)

« on: April 15, 2016, 03:55:19 PM »

Thank you.
Keep up the good work, and remember, that with more and more endurance on some UAV's , and higher camera resolution, one of your most valuable advantages in the market *may* be processing within reasonable hardware specifications.

Maybe even more parts of the processing can be done in chunks that make typical workstations capable of doing it.

29

Bug Reports / Re: Processed a map, but unable to export to tiff/bigtiff (PhotoScanPro1.2.4)

« on: April 15, 2016, 02:56:27 PM »

the process used up 150GB of swap + 30GB RAM - did not generate a file, and was apparently stuck at 0% .
But I guess you are sure, and if it all needs to be assembled in memory, before writeout to file, I see how this can go wrong (except ~100GB was available)

I hope/guess you are already working on a sequential file writing technique that does not  require it all to fit in RAM first ?
When can we expect such improvement ?

30

Feature Requests / Please make batch processing display time spent per step

« on: April 15, 2016, 01:49:50 PM »

Please add information about time use for completed steps like:

"Dense Cloud...  completed in 1h23m"