Messages

31

General / Re: Upload to Sketchfab - no texture?

« on: November 19, 2015, 06:41:44 PM »

HI Alexey,

I will give it a try on some other datasets since the upload is complete on sketchfab but still no texture.

Kevin

32

General / Re: Upload to Sketchfab - no texture?

« on: November 19, 2015, 06:31:03 PM »

In the two datasets I was trying, I couldn't determine from the info what parameters were used for the texture for some reason. The texture appears in the view, but wasn't in the info.

I did however recreate the texture as an Orthophote with 4192*4192 texture size, and tried to reupload and the texture still does not come across.

Kevin

33

General / Upload to Sketchfab - no texture?

« on: November 19, 2015, 05:51:32 PM »

Is there a way to upload the texture with the 3D model when exporting directly from Agisoft to Sketchfab??

34

General / Re: SSL SUPPORT NOT AVAILABLE

« on: November 18, 2015, 05:59:10 PM »

So I don't seem to get the out of memory error now, but then i get other errors.

I have finally gotten to the upload stage, and it goes thru the upload process, then get the attached error with the details here:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Error><Code>XAmzContentSHA256Mismatch</Code><Message>The provided 'x-amz-content-sha256' header does not match what was computed.</Message><ClientComputedContentSHA256>2664c0769026fb06606e7429b4016e15d5e0b3bd6573bf6b54a992c0782c6441</ClientComputedContentSHA256><S3ComputedContentSHA256>9629a7f40d2ff4032da027bc06a687a595a955c9a3fc7ee92e18b70cfa6f16fb</S3ComputedContentSHA256><RequestId>A936C3C52C7CBBB5</RequestId><HostId>y+j5ekqofajWj4iakUNjCbqumj260+XIdwQI0t8TuRnGAtGoS5yRrNOgaItPJArgQV7YftE4qwU=</HostId></Error>

35

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: November 18, 2015, 05:07:58 PM »

Attached is a screenshot of a stockpile i was trying to determine a volume of, along with the measure report.

I created a dense cloud, then a DEM from it (with interpolation on), and then created the polygon around the pile. Many of the nodes show a zero elevation for some reason.

I also created contours on the DEM, and they look fine.

I have tried it on a number of different projects as well, and will more often than not see the zero elevation for many of the nodes.

Kevin

36

General / Re: SSL SUPPORT NOT AVAILABLE

« on: November 13, 2015, 11:43:01 PM »

I tried this as well, and I don't get the SSL error anymore, but now i just get an Out of Memory error when trying to upload.

Any ideas?

Kevin

37

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: November 13, 2015, 11:33:01 PM »

I am having problems with the Measure Shape tools on a DEM. I have a stockpile that i drew a shape around, and used the measure shape command, and the volumes are out to lunch.

However, it seems to be with how the polygon is created. I picked points with the polygon tool, on areas entirely withing the DEM, but when you perform "measure shape", on the planar tab has many of the polygon nodes with an elevation of 0.

It seems like when picking points of the polygon some elevations are to the DEM, while others are Zero. Anyone else have this issue??

Kevin

38

General / Re: Vertical error in DSM to Ground Control

« on: October 14, 2015, 04:03:06 PM »

Hi Alexey,

I used the following settings:

Dense Point Cloud - Medium with moderate depth filtering ( also tried low and high and got same results)
Model - Used height field with dense cloud, with a high face count
Export DEM - exported using as given pizel size values of 0.12m

I tried this in the version 1.1.6 version, as well as the new beta release, and also changed a number of the parameters as above, and it all gave me similar results.

I also tried just exporting the Dense Point Cloud and create a surface in third party software, and it had the same issue. So it seems like it is happening directly from that step.

Kevin

39

General / Re: Vertical error in DSM to Ground Control

« on: October 13, 2015, 09:56:51 PM »

I wanted to give this one a bump again, since I haven't heard from anyone.

Any ideas??

Kevin

40

General / Vertical error in DSM to Ground Control

« on: September 30, 2015, 09:27:30 PM »

We recently processed a site from a UAV, and placed a number of ground targets surveyed with RTK. We held 5 of the 10 points in Agisoft, and left the others as checks. The results from the processing in the Reference pane in Agisoft looked great (attached file Agisoft Errors). We created a DSM and exported as a Geotiff, then started doing further comparisons and noticed a vertical issue.

We determined the elevations of the 10 aerial targets from the exported DSM, and are finding around 5-8 cm in vertical differences from the DSM to our ground targets (attached file Error Check).

I would assume that our resulting DSM should give us close to identical errors as shown in the reference pane in Agisoft? Why would it be different?

Kevin

41

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: September 03, 2015, 04:55:10 PM »

In the new Build DEM function, there is the resolution field that appears to be editable but i can't seem to change it. Three questions on this:

1) How is the default value determined? Is it based on dense cloud quality, image resolution,
2) Is this supposed to be an editable field?
3) Will there be a smoothing or simplification function for a DEM?

Also, any chance the display of the coordinate information could also appear when in the model tab as it now does in the Ortho tab?? This would be great.

On more thing. Could you add functionality to the new polygon command in the Ortho editor to draw orthogonal lines? Perhaps when you hold the shift key it will snap to orthogonal?? This would be ideal to generate perfectly square or rectangle clip areas of an DEM or Ortho.

Great work on the updates, this version is fantastic so far!

Kevin

42

General / Automatic sub-chunks?

« on: August 04, 2015, 09:48:49 PM »

I have a corridor of UAV images we collected in 2 passes, but it is quite vegetated so it is having issues to align in one shot.

Is there a way that Agisoft can automatically sub-cluster images that align?? I am finding that there may be a section of images that align, but the ones that don't I move to a new chunk and align. Then there is a section of those that align, so i then move the ones that don't to a new chunk and align. Repeat.....

In the end, i may only have about 10 percent of images that don't align, but this is quite a manual process.

There isn't a way to sub-chunk (the technical term!!) groups of images when aligning??

Kevin

43

Feature Requests / Re: Batch Orthophoto Export

« on: July 28, 2015, 07:17:33 PM »

I would to add the same request to add ECW as an orthophoto export option.

Kevin

44

General / Re: Manually edit image coordinates?

« on: July 28, 2015, 06:07:55 PM »

Wow, i was scratching my head on that one for a bit, since you used to be able to click with the mouse to edit.

Thanks though, that works!

Kevin

45

General / Manually edit image coordinates?

« on: July 28, 2015, 05:55:44 PM »

Is it just me, or can you not manually edit the image location anymore?? Some of my imagery has bogus elevations from GPS at time, so I used to manually edit, but now it doesn't seem to work.

Any ideas?

Kevin