Messages

31

General / Re: Dense Cloud gaps

« on: October 26, 2015, 10:05:25 PM »

Hi Matt,
you can define a smaller bounding box on a area of interest, so you can try different settings in a short time (less area to process).
So the tree height is the objetive... you can try medium quality with no or mild filtering?

32

General / Re: Dense Cloud gaps

« on: October 26, 2015, 06:27:51 AM »

Hi Matt,
Ultra and high tend to create gaps (more on ultra than high).
For aereal photography, medium quality is recomended and is more than sufficient.

Regards,

tutos

33

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: August 28, 2015, 08:35:18 PM »

thanks Alexey!

34

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: August 27, 2015, 10:43:14 PM »

Hello Alexey,
I tried this workflow hoping that roofs will be computed with higher accuracy.
So I marked a roof with the polygon and assigned an image to it where the whole roof is visible.
But the jagged roof edge is still there.
I have attached a screenshot.

Regards,
Mathias

yes, is pointless choose photos if all of them are jagged due to orthorectification, we need choose photos WITHOUT orthorectification.

35

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: August 14, 2015, 02:29:06 AM »

hi alexey, sorry, "projection" isn`t the word. I refer to use photos without orthorectification (original photos) over the mesh to avoid malformations... but this on the orthomosaic editing feature (assign images) like pix4d.

36

General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.2.0 pre-release

« on: August 07, 2015, 11:19:51 PM »

Hi alexey,
about the seamlines photos,  they are only in orthogonal projection, so, if you got a bad building geometry, all photos are with artifacts due to projection. Can add a option to choose a planar projection?

Thanks

37

General / Re: Aligning huge projects

« on: July 25, 2015, 09:57:27 AM »

Is an aerial Project?

38

General / Re: $600 upgrade for Photoscan Pro machine.

« on: July 20, 2015, 11:31:11 PM »

hi saffer,
by the Budget, is the best.
a question: how many photos you want process? Photoscan is very hungry of ram haha

39

General / Re: Coordinate system for planet Mercury in PhotoScan

« on: May 11, 2015, 11:00:52 PM »

hi dellagiu,
see the attachments 

40

General / Re: Coordinate system for planet Mercury in PhotoScan

« on: May 07, 2015, 11:43:13 PM »

hi dellagiu,
you can import the coordinate system as .PRJ file.
The same page provide the coordinate system as .prj

41

General / Re: Proposed Photoscan Build

« on: May 07, 2015, 08:11:47 AM »

hi super_saffer,

gpu backplate: not necesary
liquid cooling: not necesary
CPU: search a high cpu clock and more cores, like a i7 4930k
RAM: ddr3 is cheaper (64gb ddr3=$500 vs 64gb ddr4=$700) , so use a ddr3 platform and you can spend more in the cpu

42

General / Re: 2D ORTHOMOSAIC

« on: May 03, 2015, 02:15:44 AM »

Sample source images and screengrabs of problems would help identify where your problems are.

Is not a source problem, the lack of a mosaic editor where you can define seamlines is the problem.

43

Feature Requests / Re: Orthomosaics and Export perimeters

« on: April 21, 2015, 06:16:14 PM »

thanks alexey!
i hope will be soon, many clients complain about the artefacts around the buildings on the orthophoto (due to the orthorectification), so i'm forced to use pix4d only for the seamline capabilities (specially the planar proyection option for a seamline).

44

General / Re: Trouble with getting good Orthophoto

« on: April 13, 2015, 10:09:17 PM »

Hi Deronm,

1) Your flight plan don't look very well, do it like a grid with a high overlap (80%-60%)
2) The uav-terrain distance obviusly  is not equal to uav-tower, so take extra photos with a higher elevation of the tower
3) take a look on this site, specially on the "Large Vertical Objects reconstruction": https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/202557459
4) sorry for my english :p

45

Feature Requests / Re: Orthomosaics and Export perimeters

« on: April 08, 2015, 06:49:06 AM »

Next major update, 1.2 or 2.0?

thanks