Messages

61

Bug Reports / Re: Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: May 01, 2017, 09:46:58 AM »

Sorry for delay in replying.

show_info screenshot is attached.

Also, I looked into shapes.zip\doc.xml. I see the following. I do not understand the different EPSG values. I would have expected some reference to EPSG:2193
    <crs>PROJCS["NZGD_2000_New_Zealand_Transverse_Mercator",GEOGCS["GCS_NZGD_2000",DATUM["D_NZGD_2000",SPHEROID["GRS 1980",6378137,298.257222101,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9102"]]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator",AUTHORITY["EPSG","9807"]],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",173],PARAMETER["scale_factor",0.9996],PARAMETER["false_easting",1600000],PARAMETER["false_northing",10000000],UNIT["metre",1,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]]]</crs>

62

Bug Reports / Re: Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: April 20, 2017, 11:20:30 AM »

I'm using the same coordinate system for GCPs and shapefiles. Sometimes the shapefiles are visible, but not this time.

63

Bug Reports / Re: Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: April 20, 2017, 06:36:20 AM »

SHP files attached. For Alexey.
I imported each file, 2D and 3D, after aligning photos and observing GCPs. Both shapes are invisible.

64

Bug Reports / Re: Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: April 14, 2017, 01:30:06 PM »

I won't be back at work until Tuesday, so I'll see what I can test or send then. Thanks.

65

Bug Reports / Re: Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: April 14, 2017, 01:07:55 PM »

Did you mean to say 2D, Alexey?
The polygon/region is just a external boundary around the most important part of the model. There is no data in it that is useful. I must be missing something in the specification about 50% of the time. The last time I created a shapefile to use, neither the 2D or the 3D versions became visible.
- do I have to remove spaces from the file name?
- do I have to remove data columns?
- do I have to use a polyline instead of a polygon?

66

Bug Reports / Specification of Shape files, so I can see on model

« on: April 14, 2017, 12:46:52 PM »

When I import a 2D or 3D shapefile (polygon), to view on my model, sometimes they are visible, sometimes they are not.
If they are not visible, I try simplifying them to reduce the node count. That doesn't work, still invisible.
Then I tried a KML file, but got an error message - something like it couldn't accept it.

Is there a specification that always works?

67

Feature Requests / Re: Use shapes / KML files to fit bounding box size

« on: April 13, 2017, 04:53:50 AM »

+1

68

Bug Reports / Re: 1.3.1.4030 won't activate

« on: April 13, 2017, 01:10:58 AM »

Hello rossnixon,

Seems that you were trying to activate the expired trial license key instead of permanent license.

Oops! Yes, sorry!!!
I still had a problem activating with the permanent key.
Then I tried the command-line method, but that complained about access to the folder.
Then used the command-line in admin mode, and it WORKED.
All happy now 

69

Bug Reports / Re: 1.3.1.4030 won't activate

« on: April 12, 2017, 02:02:06 AM »

Have got no license (.lic) files. Now getting help via email to support.

70

Bug Reports / Re: 1.3.1.4030 won't activate

« on: April 11, 2017, 06:16:09 AM »

Now I have reinstalled 1.2.6 expecting it to work.
But my serial/key will no longer activate that version either.
It says 30 days left. 

71

Bug Reports / Re: 1.3.1.4030 won't activate

« on: April 11, 2017, 05:55:25 AM »

I reinstalled 1.2.6, which it somehow knew was activated already. Then the 'DEACTIVATE' option appeared.
I deactivated it.

Then I installed 1.3.1. This was not activated automatically. I entered the serial/code. This has not helped.
What now? 

72

Bug Reports / 1.3.1.4030 won't activate

« on: April 11, 2017, 05:51:33 AM »

I had 1.2.6 Pro and then installed 1.3.1.4030.
It says it has activated when I put in my serial/code numbers, but it hasn't.

I searched the forum, and it said to 'deactivate' first. I could not find this deactivate option - does it mean uninstall?
I tried uninstall/reinstall, but that hasn't helped. 

73

General / Re: Reducing file size of Orthomosaics

« on: April 05, 2017, 10:54:38 PM »

I find ECW to be the best format when wanting to reduce file sizes by a large amount. Typically they will be a twentieth of the size of an uncompressed image.

74

General / Re: DNG colour shift

« on: April 05, 2017, 01:21:30 PM »

Do you need 16bit images? I drop them to 8bit (per channel), or as I prefer to call it 24bit colour. Then I save as lossless PNG with max internal compression option..

75

General / Re: Duration of photo alignment

« on: March 24, 2017, 01:11:46 AM »

Thanks, next time I will try the generic preselection.

The images have no long/lat data in the EXIF, but I imported the coordinates from a text/log file. So a rough position (+/- 5m) is existing.

@rossnixon: did you use the generic preselection?

I used 'Reference' & 'Adaptive camera model fitting'.
I recommend you update the EXIF data in your images. I think there are programs that will do that from a data (text?) file.