Messages

31

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: April 05, 2021, 12:56:42 PM »

Jnb,

As a test. Did you try to reconstruct the mesh after disabling the depth maps that seem to be wrong (& keeping all the others obviously)?
Disable the photos then re-generate mesh with re-use depth maps option selected.

Mak

32

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: April 05, 2021, 12:44:36 PM »

This is the most relevant information as JNB noted.
https://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=13066.msg58741#msg58741

Some of the depth maps seem to be completely wrong.

BTW jnb.. Which GPU are you using?

Mak

33

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: April 05, 2021, 12:30:28 AM »

I think that its perfectly clear from the results shown in this thread; that the new depth maps generation method suffers from issues when the result are vastly different (better) when the depth maps are generated via the previous method with the exact same data set (using exactly the same settings)

Mak

34

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: April 04, 2021, 07:18:45 PM »

What is this SGM & PM depth maps thing?

Mak

35

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: April 03, 2021, 01:50:15 PM »

Unfortunately the pre-release of 1.7.3 ( https://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=13045.msg58730#msg58730) doesn't fix the issue at all & that's a really shame.

Mak

36

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: March 15, 2021, 05:56:17 AM »

FYI Version 1.7.2 build 12040 doesn't seem bring any improvement to this issue on Medium/High unfortunately..





But Ultra-High looks better (albeit still with un-wanted geo flying around..thankfully those can be easily discarded in 2 clicks)




Mak

37

General / Re: Hughe issues to align pictures

« on: March 11, 2021, 07:08:24 PM »

Make sure to list your HW specs and Metashape + GPU driver version.

Mak

38

General / Re: Change in hardware leads to sparser depth maps

« on: March 01, 2021, 01:43:40 PM »

I've been suspecting for a little while that their are issues/differences with the OpenCL path compared to the CUDA path.
Hopefully the Agisoft team can finally take a closer look into this..

Mak

39

General / Re: White Texture?

« on: February 26, 2021, 01:29:42 AM »

Looks like you processed the Ambiant Occlusion map instead of the diffuse.



Mak

40

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: February 22, 2021, 02:28:46 AM »

Alexey,

1.7.2 still exhibits the same issues (maybe a bit less than 1.7.x ):



Mak

41

General / Re: Incomplete mesh in V1.71 where V1.65 was able to construct a closed mesh

« on: February 14, 2021, 09:35:16 PM »

Hello,

Very good to know, as I also have this problem. Thank you for the fast resolve.
Are the errors in mesh reconstruction from depth maps as shown in attachement also linked to this specific issue ?

Thank you

Yup this is my main issue with 1.7.x I surely hope that this can get resolved sooner rather than later.

Mak

42

General / Re: Comparison between different versions of Metashape (v1.6.4 - v1.7.0 - v1.7.1)

« on: February 12, 2021, 02:50:03 AM »

Hard for me to say but I don't do what you dealing with 3D products. I am on more of aerial photography and GIS side so I'd say most of my project with this software DOES a really good job !!

It takes a lot of hard work to put into and learning curve on this software. I would give them the 5 stars of 5.

For me, when I read your message here , I would always suggest make a backup of your work if things goes wrong. You can always go back to the previous one.

And for the new beginners I can understand how frustrated you are and I was like that before but I didn't give it up and put my skills to use it... I love it this software...

I would not trade for any other software because if this software had not been out , I would be stuck dealing with ERDAS doing the similar work...

Just sayin' and keep learning !!!

What the hell those this have to to with the subject of this topic ?

Mak

43

General / Re: Comparison between different versions of Metashape (v1.6.4 - v1.7.0 - v1.7.1)

« on: February 12, 2021, 12:36:03 AM »

Yes. I can confirm that and several users have already reported the same issues unfortunately.
Another identical report already posted yesterday in the Bugs sub-forum:
https://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=13075.0

Mak

44

General / Re: Meshing Very Thin Objects

« on: February 07, 2021, 09:26:03 PM »

Alexey,

What is the purpose of this tweak?

Mak

45

Bug Reports / Re: 1.7.1 fails to build depth maps with same amount of VRAM as 1.6.5

« on: February 03, 2021, 01:04:55 AM »

jedfrechette,

Are you using the latest nvidia drivers ?

Mak