37
« on: June 05, 2012, 04:01:07 AM »
Dear Geert
First of all, thanks again for your reply.
Just let me say, in my 14 years as cartographer engineer working and dealing with mapping - aerial and terrestrial photogrammetric, topographic and GPS survey, GIS projects, and now working as consultant for many customers as diverse like mining, forestry, urban cities, agricultural and environment, it is very interesting how come a simple question turn out to weird path.
I assume most of the users of PS know the big difference between laser vs pixel data.
I?ve been looking for a just a alternative solution or, let me say, a better idea to how to overcome this.
When I talk about the las format is because it is a standard format sponsored by ASPRS and ISPRS, as simple as that.
I like when people wants to help others, and I would like to think you wanted to do this.
But I don?t think a lecture on us about the pixel, laser, etc is necessary, or better, the way you put.
Again, I would like to think you are helping us but not in those "kind" terms you put.
Everybody here is dealing with new technologies every day and some of us are dealing with old and new mapping projects techniques for the last 14 years.
I hope is clear now.
Show Posts
