Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - flyzk

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 11:30:36 PM »
Thanks for your help Paulo!

East North Alti
321294.397 7681606.334 11.304
321372.135 7683392.457 8.955
321179.878 7682426.914 2.417
321360.926 7683811.359 3.321

17
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 11:08:40 PM »
Yes this is the same

18
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 10:16:59 PM »
Thanks Paulo for the help,

When I change my marker + my project coordinate system for the new one, yes I'm able to create DEM & to export it  but I also lost 10cm accuracy into my checkpoint/gcps unfortunatly

It seems I will have to create DEM using another soft and them import it again to perform the orthophoto :-(

19
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:37:21 PM »
Hey Alexey,
thanks for this answer.

If I understand well, I can either create a DEM without using Point Cloud (which is not possible in my case, since I need to filtering many things before like water), or expand the geoid file?
I think I have to expend the Geoid file.
About expending the geoid file, can you explain how can I do that? Can I use Agisoft for this task? the only field where I see  "No data value" is when I've already built a DEM (in another Coordinate system) and I try to export it then I can see this value: -32767, can I change something there?
thanks

Edit: I can also see this field when I import GEOID and the same data is fill: -32768

20
Feature Requests / Re: Spanish geoid rednap08
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:07:59 PM »
Hi Paulo,
This approach is good if you only fly in NADIR?
I use to fly a false Nadir (80-85) in order to get more detail.
What should I use to do?

Do the same trick you did 2 times in order to get a calibration parametter reusable for next flights. Then, separate each flight in 2 camera calibration group (one for 85 and the other for 80) and then apply the matching camera calibration parametter?
And every time I change the pitch angle I should previoulsy have determinated the calibration parametter for this angle?

21
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 07:48:58 PM »
Hey,

Thanks for following my case.

I've did some tries:
-export .LAS with this GEOID works
-export mesh in .PLY with this GEOID works
-building DEM from Tie point with this GEOID : works
-building DEM from Point Cloud with this GEOID: doesn't work
-exporting DEM (built in another GEOID) in this GEOID: doesn't work

I've send you a wetransfer with datas you've asked.
Let me know

22
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 05:19:08 PM »
Hi guys,
Thanks for help.
Thanks Paul, I've spent a lot of time trying many solutions.. The problem appears for me when Building DEM with this coordinate system or when trying to export a DEM with this coordinate system.
I get some negativ Z value into my .LAS.
Alexey, I've tried to convert my pictures into this coordinate system.
Everything has the same now (picture/project/marker) no one is out of range, and it still doesn't work.

23
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:57:04 AM »
an option to select point by altitude (range) could be usefull to fix this issue or be able to set Z minimum when building DEM.

24
Bug Reports / Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:30:24 AM »
hey,

I use 1.7.1, and I meet issues since 1.7.0 : I always get "Vertical Datum out of range".

I use local GEOID for markers and project. My pictures are in WGS 84. Project and marker : RGR92 + Geoid RAR07
I'm able to align/optimize/build dense cloud.
But when I try to: create DEM with this coordinate system I get the error. If I build the DEM in another system it works, but when I want to export with this coordinate system I get same error.


Do you think I get this error because negativ value?
Is there any fix?

25
Feature Requests / Re: Measurement in VIEWER
« on: January 25, 2021, 03:56:20 PM »
Slope & 2D measures & 3D measures & azimuth (in case of  coordinate not local) would be awesome.
Do you plan to add more tools?

26
Feature Requests / Re: Cloud Measure
« on: January 24, 2021, 06:36:35 PM »
thanks Alexey for the repply.

Just to add a thing : it would be very nice, if the measure tools would also available when it is embbed to a website.

hope this feature will be not delayed !

27
General / Re: Import Laserscan data -registration lost
« on: January 22, 2021, 06:12:28 PM »
Following !
I need the same feature: using the accuracy of laser scan to be use as reference for my picture alignement.

28
General / Re: Agisoft Metashape 1.7.0 pre-release
« on: January 01, 2021, 06:53:45 PM »
Hi, happy new year ! When can we expect a upgrade of the pdf manual for 1.7 ?

29
Feature Requests / Cloud Measure
« on: December 28, 2020, 10:26:00 PM »
Hi,
It would be very very usefull to have some tools to do some 2D/3D measures by using the Agisoft Cloud.
Be able to visualize photogrammetric datas is nice, but just to do some measures (to share this feature to my customer) I have to pay another Photogrammetric Software.. it seems a duplicate fee and time.
Even if we are not able to export any shape yet, measuring 'only' would be a very great upgrade.
Also, it would be usefull to know if you plan to release such feature in 2021: before buying 3rd party software annual software for this feature...

thanks

30
General / Re: HELP to Build new Computer
« on: August 03, 2018, 01:00:03 PM »
Hi ManishSahu,

Dual AMD CPU is interesting.. any benchmark with agisoft comparing with I9 or Threadripper?
I can put 1000-1500€ for CPU, which CPU would you recommand to me?  Do you think 2x CPU AMD can increase time process (comparated to I9 or Threadripper)? even with low clock (~2.2) : I was thinking about the 16core serie

and I don't find any motherboard for this socket... any idea?

I would love to build a scalable and evolutive computer, but my lack of knowledge afraid me... I don't wanna do a >5k € misstake or... be a TESTER/BENSHMARKER..

thanks for help !

Pages: 1 [2] 3