Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - flyzk

Pages: 1 [2] 3
Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 11:30:36 PM »
Thanks for your help Paulo!

East North Alti
321294.397 7681606.334 11.304
321372.135 7683392.457 8.955
321179.878 7682426.914 2.417
321360.926 7683811.359 3.321

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 11:08:40 PM »
Yes this is the same

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 10:16:59 PM »
Thanks Paulo for the help,

When I change my marker + my project coordinate system for the new one, yes I'm able to create DEM & to export it  but I also lost 10cm accuracy into my checkpoint/gcps unfortunatly

It seems I will have to create DEM using another soft and them import it again to perform the orthophoto :-(

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:37:21 PM »
Hey Alexey,
thanks for this answer.

If I understand well, I can either create a DEM without using Point Cloud (which is not possible in my case, since I need to filtering many things before like water), or expand the geoid file?
I think I have to expend the Geoid file.
About expending the geoid file, can you explain how can I do that? Can I use Agisoft for this task? the only field where I see  "No data value" is when I've already built a DEM (in another Coordinate system) and I try to export it then I can see this value: -32767, can I change something there?

Edit: I can also see this field when I import GEOID and the same data is fill: -32768

Feature Requests / Re: Spanish geoid rednap08
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:07:59 PM »
Hi Paulo,
This approach is good if you only fly in NADIR?
I use to fly a false Nadir (80-85) in order to get more detail.
What should I use to do?

Do the same trick you did 2 times in order to get a calibration parametter reusable for next flights. Then, separate each flight in 2 camera calibration group (one for 85 and the other for 80) and then apply the matching camera calibration parametter?
And every time I change the pitch angle I should previoulsy have determinated the calibration parametter for this angle?

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 07:48:58 PM »

Thanks for following my case.

I've did some tries:
-export .LAS with this GEOID works
-export mesh in .PLY with this GEOID works
-building DEM from Tie point with this GEOID : works
-building DEM from Point Cloud with this GEOID: doesn't work
-exporting DEM (built in another GEOID) in this GEOID: doesn't work

I've send you a wetransfer with datas you've asked.
Let me know

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 05:19:08 PM »
Hi guys,
Thanks for help.
Thanks Paul, I've spent a lot of time trying many solutions.. The problem appears for me when Building DEM with this coordinate system or when trying to export a DEM with this coordinate system.
I get some negativ Z value into my .LAS.
Alexey, I've tried to convert my pictures into this coordinate system.
Everything has the same now (picture/project/marker) no one is out of range, and it still doesn't work.

Bug Reports / Re: Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:57:04 AM »
an option to select point by altitude (range) could be usefull to fix this issue or be able to set Z minimum when building DEM.

Bug Reports / Vertical Datum out of range 1.7.1
« on: January 30, 2021, 09:30:24 AM »

I use 1.7.1, and I meet issues since 1.7.0 : I always get "Vertical Datum out of range".

I use local GEOID for markers and project. My pictures are in WGS 84. Project and marker : RGR92 + Geoid RAR07
I'm able to align/optimize/build dense cloud.
But when I try to: create DEM with this coordinate system I get the error. If I build the DEM in another system it works, but when I want to export with this coordinate system I get same error.

Do you think I get this error because negativ value?
Is there any fix?

Feature Requests / Re: Measurement in VIEWER
« on: January 25, 2021, 03:56:20 PM »
Slope & 2D measures & 3D measures & azimuth (in case of  coordinate not local) would be awesome.
Do you plan to add more tools?

Feature Requests / Re: Cloud Measure
« on: January 24, 2021, 06:36:35 PM »
thanks Alexey for the repply.

Just to add a thing : it would be very nice, if the measure tools would also available when it is embbed to a website.

hope this feature will be not delayed !

General / Re: Import Laserscan data -registration lost
« on: January 22, 2021, 06:12:28 PM »
Following !
I need the same feature: using the accuracy of laser scan to be use as reference for my picture alignement.

General / Re: Agisoft Metashape 1.7.0 pre-release
« on: January 01, 2021, 06:53:45 PM »
Hi, happy new year ! When can we expect a upgrade of the pdf manual for 1.7 ?

Feature Requests / Cloud Measure
« on: December 28, 2020, 10:26:00 PM »
It would be very very usefull to have some tools to do some 2D/3D measures by using the Agisoft Cloud.
Be able to visualize photogrammetric datas is nice, but just to do some measures (to share this feature to my customer) I have to pay another Photogrammetric Software.. it seems a duplicate fee and time.
Even if we are not able to export any shape yet, measuring 'only' would be a very great upgrade.
Also, it would be usefull to know if you plan to release such feature in 2021: before buying 3rd party software annual software for this feature...


General / Re: HELP to Build new Computer
« on: August 03, 2018, 01:00:03 PM »
Hi ManishSahu,

Dual AMD CPU is interesting.. any benchmark with agisoft comparing with I9 or Threadripper?
I can put 1000-1500€ for CPU, which CPU would you recommand to me?  Do you think 2x CPU AMD can increase time process (comparated to I9 or Threadripper)? even with low clock (~2.2) : I was thinking about the 16core serie

and I don't find any motherboard for this socket... any idea?

I would love to build a scalable and evolutive computer, but my lack of knowledge afraid me... I don't wanna do a >5k € misstake or... be a TESTER/BENSHMARKER..

thanks for help !

Pages: 1 [2] 3