Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - bestable

Pages: 1 [2] 3
I have used Tripod + Ringlight (indoors).  Took RAW photos and increased contrast while unifying lighting in RAW editor.
Your outdoors photo look fine. Tripod would help for You in the future.

Your photos aligned fine for me. Try more Keypoints
I have just masked first photo with a pear.

I attach mine banana dataset for You to play. Hope this helps:

Bananas are hard! ;) I mean it. Apples, pears etc are much easier.  Banana has very complicated shape to capture in focus.
I was struggling with them as well.

ƒ/5 is not enough- bump it up to ~10. Your depth of field is ruining the focus.
Current dataset- 1/4th of the photos has focus issues.

Feature Requests / Re: Paint Masks with Brush
« on: March 26, 2020, 02:32:10 PM »
I do it in Blender, 2d Animation, > grease pencil

Feature Requests / Re: Paint Masks with Brush
« on: March 25, 2020, 06:02:19 PM »
It looks like it is just me and You, James. Sadly. This could have been huge timesaver.

Feature Requests / Paint Masks with Brush
« on: March 10, 2020, 10:43:25 AM »
With "Strict masking" it is possible to get great results from few an very simple masks. No need to fine trace edges.

I just wish they could be created more easily, something like circular brush with adjustable size would be perfect.

P.S. I cant fathom how to use "Intelligent Paint".

Bug Reports / Re: FBX export ultra slow on Windows !!
« on: February 28, 2020, 05:25:14 PM »
Alembic is faster, right, but Substance Designer does not accept abc files. What do You use to convert abc to Substance Designer compatible mesh ?

Bug Reports / Re: FBX export ultra slow on Windows !!
« on: February 24, 2020, 03:44:49 PM »
Old post revival, but this is still happening with latest version.

FBX 1Mil export takes too long.

General / DataSet processing challenge.
« on: December 11, 2019, 11:19:29 PM »
Hi everyone!
I do have some problems with choosing best parameters in MetaShape for some projects.
I hope I am not alone and we can all share best practices and learn from each other.

I shot this sculpture:

Feel free to download this dataset and play with it.

Just for comparison I tried this data set on Reality Capture, 3DF Zephyr, Meshroom for comparison. So that is possible to achieve a reasonable model out of them.

That is what I can get with Metashape:  :(

It's just hard for me to achieve good results with MetaShape with these photos. Legs are the hardest part.
I know photos from the phone are not the best source, but Reality Capture seems to process it rather good.

I am open to hearing from You how would You process this dataset.
Please download the set and try to extract the best model You can.
Please post pictures, Settings used, Steps You took etc.

Please do not use MetaShape PRO version features.

If You try, but could not get better result, please write as well.

Feature Requests / Re: option to not reset view after processing step.
« on: November 27, 2019, 12:36:58 PM »
+1 vote

That is my progress pics of the described workflow except i did not use "detected markers" part:

Any workflow for Standard version users?
I feel left out a bit.

Me neither. I would like to see detailed walkthrough.. For now it seems that reality capture performs a lot better.

Pages: 1 [2] 3