Messages

1

Python and Java API / Re: List of Tweaks ?

« on: April 14, 2021, 07:39:27 PM »

Any update on this?

2

General / Re: Problem alignment

« on: April 13, 2021, 10:20:20 PM »

Hello Alex,

There is a big difference between the altitude, this because of the difference days of mapping.

2 offset levels

3

General / Problem alignment

« on: April 13, 2021, 08:10:59 PM »

Hello,

I have mapped a site over 2 days period, after alignment i get 2 clouds offseted from each other
See attached image, anyone got an idea?

BR

4

General / Splitting project in chuncks (5000 pictures)

« on: April 13, 2021, 06:47:50 PM »

Hello,

I have a question, i have a big project with 5000 images of 20mp. It's a factory site.
I want to proces the entire site in a high to ultra high pointcloud to combine with terrestal scanning.

Is it better to match all images and then split up the project?

Thanks in advance

5

General / 1.7.2 GPU usage

« on: April 13, 2021, 01:32:39 PM »

Hello,
I noticed when viewing mesh / pointcloud / sparse cloud my gpu spikes to 100% in 1.7.2

Did something change or is my GPU just broken?

I have an GTX 1080Ti.

Thanks in advance

6

General / Artifacts on mesh

« on: March 25, 2021, 08:26:35 PM »

Hello,

I'm using 1.7.2 but i have a problem regarding artifacts.

See attached image for example, anyone knows how to get rid of them?
I created a mesh from depthmaps in high quality mild filtering

Best regards

7

General / Re: Problem with phantom 4 pro and samsung S20 matching

« on: March 24, 2021, 10:49:08 PM »

Hello Alexey,

I used align on high settings, 80K and generic preselection, some of my phantom have been aligned with the samsung

8

General / Problem with phantom 4 pro and samsung S20 matching

« on: March 24, 2021, 07:30:05 PM »

Hello,

I have a combined project but something goed wrong with the alignment.
Does anyone knows how to fix this?

Best regards

9

General / main/dense_cloud_max_neighbors

« on: February 15, 2021, 09:16:40 AM »

Beste,

When trying to use the parameter : main/dense_cloud_max_neighbors in metashape 1.7.1 i get the error: the parameter is not found.

Anyone got an idea?

Best regards

10

General / Re: Sparse cloud is clean, but dense cloud kind of a mess? screenshot attached.

« on: February 14, 2021, 10:28:20 PM »

Hello,

I have the sampe problem, how do i put in the tweak for the max neighbors, because its not working and giving errors.

Br

11

General / Re: Problem alignment

« on: September 10, 2020, 08:50:27 PM »

That worked, Thanks

12

General / Problem alignment

« on: September 07, 2020, 07:39:46 PM »

Hello,

I have the following isue, i have aligned the project but there is a something wrong with it.


Has anyone ever had this problem?

Greetings

13

General / Re: V 1.6.0 - Dense cloud generation time longer, increased noise

« on: July 18, 2020, 10:01:03 PM »

it's not fixed in the newer version

14

General / Re: V 1.6.0 - Dense cloud generation time longer, increased noise

« on: July 17, 2020, 04:32:39 AM »

Is this something that will improve in the future?

I have an I9 9900K with 32 gb ram and gtx1080Ti, but i want to create dense point clouds in ultra settings to combine with laser scanning, but since 1.6.x the time to create them have increased to much, more then a week to create a solid model with tweak: max neighbours = -1 or else the model looks rubbish.

Is it then better to downgrade to 1.5.X or even 1.4.X versions? I dont care about mesh i only make dense clouds and orthos.

Anyone got an idea?

Best regards

15

General / P4 RTK questions workflow error in convertin?

« on: July 15, 2020, 01:59:30 PM »

Hello,

I have a pilot who sends me data collected with the P4RTK, i can only get good results iff i use a lot of GCP's, deselect al the photos and run optimisation on all parameters,  like you would do in a normal P4P workflow.

When using only 1 ground control point i have 8 cm error in Northing axes, can it be that there is a problem with agisoft to convert from WGS84 to my local projection?
In this case i'm using 31370 (Belgium lambert 72).

Thanks in advance