Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dronesurveyconsultancy

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
General / Help reconstruction Castle
« on: October 10, 2019, 02:23:47 PM »
hello!

I have some problems reconstructing a castle, going for a high resolution high accuracy 3D model and ortho.

Flight was with my phantom 4 pro and gcp with a topcon hyper sr.

1 set of flights was a double cross grid 90° down at 41 m height.  (overlap 85/80)

--> problem, my GCP were not measured accurate (only 4cm accuracy) because there are a lot of trees on site.

2 set of flights was a double grid 75° down at 45 m height. (overlap: 85 / 80)

GCPS are ok, i can generate a decent cloud but my ortho looks crappy and overal there is a lot of noise in the pointcloud.

because of different lighting during recording my ortho looks like there a spots everywhere, is there a way to fix this?

Greetings


32
General / Re: Noisy point cloud - less detail compared to PIX4D
« on: September 05, 2019, 09:49:45 AM »
Unfortunately, i can not share the dataset. If i process the Nadir dataset seperately from the oblique dataset i dont have the noise. Is this normal?

Greetings

33
General / Re: Noisy point cloud - less detail compared to PIX4D
« on: September 03, 2019, 08:09:06 PM »
Mak11,

I have runned the Optimize cameras tool after every gradual selection step.
What do you mean by what is the actual result?
I have to deliver my cleaned point cloud and ortho image to my client who does the terrestal scanning
Greetings

34
General / Noisy point cloud - less detail compared to PIX4D
« on: September 03, 2019, 06:11:40 PM »
Hey All,

i did a 3D scan of some buildings, flying manual.
2 flights, first flight was Nadir 2nd was with tilted camera. Height: 30m with phantom 4 Pro.

After alignment on setting high i have a sparse cloud of 2.8 mil points.
I used gradual selection to filter out bad points, leaving me with 500K points.

I was quite disappointed with the resulted point cloud created by Agisoft: lots of noise and less detail then pix4D. (see pictures)

Does anyone have a suggestions to improve my results?

Does anyone know how to remove excessive noise other than manual cleaning in agisoft?

Have used pix4d in the past but was more a fan of agisoft till today...

Thanks in advance!

35
General / Re: Poor Dense Cloud Generation - Metashape Pro 1.5.1
« on: March 23, 2019, 07:22:30 PM »
Is there already a solution to this problem?
Having the same issues...

Pages: 1 2 [3]