Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - jackieryu

Pages: [1]

Thank you for the insight! I think the Coordinate System could be the cause of the issue, as you kindly suggest.
However, when exporting the tiled model in Cesium format, I do not have the option to change the Coordinate System. Is there a solution to enable this option?

Thank you so much for the technical support!

Thank you for the prompt response!

I've checked on the Metashape GUI, and it seems like the elevation profile are the same across the DEM, Point Cloud, and Tiled Model.

However, the problem seems to be present when I export the Tiled Models in Cesium 3D tiles.

Would it be possible to guide any way to solve this issue? Thank you.

General / Tiled model higher than original elevation when using 5174
« on: March 25, 2021, 01:22:49 PM »

Using Metashape 1.6.5, we've processed a data set in EPSG:5174.

We exported the tiled model in Cesium tiles, but the resulting data is visualized higher than the original elevation of the DEM.

This happens only when using this coordinate reference system. We were wondering if this is a CRS specific issue. If so, are there any potential solutions?

Please find the attached screenshot to help with your understanding.

Thank you.

General / Import Marker Coordinates in Image (x,y)
« on: November 25, 2020, 10:05:38 AM »

I am aware that Metashape's Python API provides methods for importing the x,y values of the GCP (markers) within images from a .txt or .csv programmatically using the following function:

PhotoScan.Marker.Projection(PhotoScan.Vector([x, y]), True).

Is there a same function for the Metashape GUI? If not, do you have plans to develop such functionaility?

Pages: [1]