Messages

46

General / Re: RTK + single GCP

« on: July 03, 2021, 09:47:09 AM »

Hey, "HansR" sounds like the owner of RedCatch!
RedToolBox is really a good software.

However, I have done many tests with UAV PPK.
One GCP is only enough if you have manageable projects.
As soon as they get a bit bigger, the whole system "tilts" around this one point.

The "golden" 5 points (dice 5) rule should still be the rule.
But of course that depends on the accuracy requirements.

47

Feature Requests / Re: Build Depth Maps as separate Job? (or at least save after creating them)

« on: July 02, 2021, 11:37:13 PM »

Ok. A workaround would of course be to calculate another "product" with depth images.
E.g. a DEM.

48

Feature Requests / Re: Build Depth Maps as separate Job? (or at least save after creating them)

« on: July 02, 2021, 08:46:23 AM »

Like this...?

49

Bug Reports / Re: Help with a heavy project

« on: June 15, 2021, 01:31:35 PM »

One "test" solution would be to leave the images in the original, but to go to Lowest for the point cloud.
In any case, I would not split the project.

50

Bug Reports / Re: Help with a heavy project

« on: June 15, 2021, 01:16:33 PM »

Let me first say, 1600 images is not a big project. (Especially not for this computer).
We use a 20Mpix drone camera and process projects with up to 6000 images.
True, they are JPEGs as our drone only outputs them. As far as I know, the profit of RAW photos is moderate, though.

So I think you should change something in the workflow.
It's definitely doable.

How high is the resolution of the images and what settings do you use for the point cloud?
(Unfortunately, I cannot see that from the screenshot because of the quality.)

51

Feature Requests / Re: Zoom to marker/shape

« on: June 15, 2021, 12:48:38 PM »

That is no problem. Mark your point and zoom in. Then go along the markers with the keys Page up / Page down.

52

General / Re: Should I build dence point cloud at all now?

« on: June 15, 2021, 12:41:45 PM »

I found the depth maps to be far more accurate and the whole process is quicker.

That's what I always thought until now. But even if I reuse the depth images, DEM creation with the point cloud is much faster than from the depth images.

53

General / Re: Pix4d and Agisoft comparison - high z errors

« on: May 27, 2021, 08:16:31 PM »

These results are not representative. Such a high error can only be due to a wrong setting, sorry...
However, the sources of error are manifold, but you have every time:
"Optimize Cameras" ?

54

Bug Reports / Re: Video Import fail 1.7.3

« on: May 21, 2021, 02:01:42 PM »

Ok, it's on its way.
The format of the M300 could really be quite different from previous drones.

55

Bug Reports / Video Import fail 1.7.3

« on: May 21, 2021, 10:29:04 AM »

Hello.

How exactly should the video import with subtitles work?
When importing a video from the DJI M300, I get an error message:


"invalid stoi argument"

 

When deleting the SRT file, the error no longer occurs.

56

General / Re: Zero Resolution coming up on all models

« on: May 14, 2021, 06:16:02 PM »

I meant of course depth maps...

57

General / Re: Zero Resolution coming up on all models

« on: May 14, 2021, 05:34:13 PM »

Hello.

This can also happen if the depth images are reused but are not there...
A bit strange...
Delete all depth images and start again.

58

Feature Requests / Re: Remove not pinned markers (blue)

« on: May 08, 2021, 04:10:59 PM »

https://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=10969.msg49466#msg49466

There is a script to remove all the blue flags.

59

General / Re: Measure 3D height from 2D image

« on: May 05, 2021, 08:26:31 PM »

You can place a marker on the picture (right mouse clock)  and you will see the coordinates...
But trees are probably very difficult to "hit".

60

General / Re: New PC system and scaling of performance

« on: May 04, 2021, 05:40:07 PM »

Thank you for the answer.

One limiting factor could be our network.
I mean that the speed also depends a lot on the network speed.