Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kris3d

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
46
General / Re: Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II di Milano
« on: September 16, 2012, 11:18:53 PM »
Alexey  I did exactly like you, but for me it does not work.
The effect is very strange

http://imageshack.us/f/339/36581855.jpg/

47
General / Re: Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II di Milano
« on: September 16, 2012, 10:38:47 PM »
In this way,
Introduced the 14mm figures. For all product images
For me it does not work.
Align is not correct.

Can you tell me how you did it
Or send me a revised this scene settings

http://imageshack.us/f/31/29740566.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/f/341/28954717.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/f/507/98663511.jpg/

48
General / Re: Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II di Milano
« on: September 16, 2012, 08:49:09 PM »
Thank you Alexey very much for your reply.
It's Sunday and I'm bored and asking questions.
But your program so I drew.
Because I sleep at night not only scans :)

Tell me please how can I manually enter the EXIF.
There is an option in PhotoScan.

49
General / Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II di Milano
« on: September 16, 2012, 02:40:09 PM »
images absolutely do not want to align




14mm lens.
With or without calibration does not want to work

Link to photos
https://www.wetransfer.com/dl/L76FORa6/01ae78e97d2ae75b03ac9315e9e7309f02ceb05fdbac3c13976c82c9d4bd93055000f0515369445

50
General / Re: bad calibration of the lens.
« on: September 15, 2012, 05:56:03 PM »
So I tried, and then it worked fine.
However, I wanted to get the best quality.
I used the calibration and alignment did not work.
I think it might be related with that situation.

There really helped Image rotation is 90 degrees.

http://www.agisoft.ru/forum/index.php?topic=574.45

51
General / Re: bad calibration of the lens.
« on: September 15, 2012, 04:45:42 PM »
I think that my calibration is wrong .73 mm
Because as her turn, the program can not properly align.
And cameras are placed randomly

These pictures are pictures cut by

52
General / bad calibration of the lens.
« on: September 15, 2012, 04:23:38 PM »
I have a continuous problem with the calibration of the lens.
The calibration parameters of the camera is bad. <cx> and <cy>, are reversed. Image rotation is 90 degrees.
How do I convert my calibration to the correct orientation.
I ask for help.
I think that my calibration is wrong .73 mm
Because as her turn, the program aligns properly.

Does it matter how taking pictures.
Whether they are vertical or horizontal


73mm

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<calibration>
  <fx>1.1895638799091885e+004</fx>
  <fy>1.1903541828061305e+004</fy>
  <cx>2.8639717769360595e+003</cx>
  <cy>1.9657232283640105e+003</cy>
  <skew>0.0000000000000000e+000</skew>
  <k1>2.4962622721719538e-001</k1>
  <k2>-1.6549059383569611e-002</k2>
  <k3>1.4308350414794238e+000</k3>
  <p1>5.3215485840205721e-003</p1>
  <p2>2.5880640359471274e-003</p2>
  <date>2012-09-13T16:25:42Z</date>
</calibration>


24mm


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<calibration>
  <fx>3.7221673101922102e+003</fx>
  <fy>3.7234713716135716e+003</fy>
  <cx>2.7909784559193295e+003</cx>
  <cy>1.8781332703852161e+003</cy>
  <skew>0.0000000000000000e+000</skew>
  <k1>-1.4015123127184947e-001</k1>
  <k2>7.7828931083552308e-002</k2>
  <k3>-2.3212033524347912e-002</k3>
  <p1>1.1152600142718013e-003</p1>
  <p2>-1.5600231530303525e-003</p2>
  <date>2012-09-14T16:05:03Z</date>
</calibration>

32mm

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<calibration>
  <fx>5.0255643137369843e+003</fx>
  <fy>5.0261392564557518e+003</fy>
  <cx>2.7911296449565157e+003</cx>
  <cy>1.8820381351645769e+003</cy>
  <skew>0.0000000000000000e+000</skew>
  <k1>-7.1226392049854453e-002</k1>
  <k2>1.2348182465707574e-001</k2>
  <k3>-1.1959963398987421e-001</k3>
  <p1>1.1400547687467650e-003</p1>
  <p2>-1.2010307621389299e-003</p2>
  <date>2012-08-25T11:07:27Z</date>
</calibration>

53
General / Re: Who can save the goddess
« on: September 14, 2012, 10:02:33 PM »
Olihar Hey, how you did it!
It looks very good!
You really have a good communication with the program.
Please enter some details, procedure.
Please give me your resolution product images, and settings.
You've done a mask?

How will you will send you the full version of the MPX 150 photos .21

54
General / Re: AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 14, 2012, 09:57:57 PM »

Looks like a re-scan of the original.
I think it is very good and fast test environment.
Especially for you. Infinite :)
You can explore different camera settings and light.
I do not destroy your system.

55
General / Re: AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 13, 2012, 07:03:53 PM »
Wishgranter Very Thanks for the information.
At first I thought that the program works more automatically.
What more I know the more I see that it is very complicated.

  I will continue to work to explore the software.
Who knows, maybe I can finally make sense of good quality scan.
ps
last test is completely realistic.
And the result is very good

56
General / Re: AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 13, 2012, 06:37:29 PM »
Alexey Thank you for all the information.
I examine this program because they want to get the best results.

adding background helped.
My conclusions
The program must have distinct points of reference in space.
Or very accurate mask
.
Blurred background introduces distortion.
Seamless background such as the sky introduces distortion.





No less certainly can be improved.
So that the program itself distinguished from the background object.
It would really help if the background is away

57
General / Re: AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 13, 2012, 05:35:21 PM »



I am very uncertain why the program creates
so weird artifacts.
In a place where nothing is!
It is a very serious problem.
The program aligns very nicely points.
But the processing of the geometry is very bad


58
General / Re: AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 13, 2012, 05:24:40 PM »
Welcome
In this test, there is no distortion of the lens.
You can check the operation of the program.
Sent you the files.
Please do check it out.



http://wtrns.fr/YEFc5LtR1canFXK


59
General / AGISOFT Laboratory Test Procedure.
« on: September 13, 2012, 03:40:52 PM »
Laboratory Test Procedure.
Environment 3d studio MAX.
The Light ideal ambient.
50mm Camera. Perfectly simple. Without any distortion.
Computer Dual Core XEON 24. 48 GB of RAM
GTX 580

PNG files with alpha channel.
Resolution Test 1536 to 1024.













ULTRA + MASK
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg41/scaled.php?server=41&filename=55621375.jpg&res=landing











1234D
Nicely cut background.
But the council does not do the whole model from one camera position.
Additional items probably would have helped.



My conclusions.
Less than 14 camer program makes mistakes.
From 16 camera effects are good.
You will not do any good without the time-consuming mask.

The basic problem is to cut out the background.
Agisoft can not do that automatically.
The advantages of the 50mm lens. and very accurate mask.
the results are very good.

60
General / Re: My tests monument
« on: September 13, 2012, 02:35:09 PM »
I use version 1542

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7