Messages

61

General / My tests monument

« on: September 13, 2012, 12:28:39 PM »

smoothed after a strong clean





shaded ok!




textures 1



http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg213/scaled.php?server=213&filename=19837537.jpg&res=landing

textures type 2


no face
there should be a face

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg823/scaled.php?server=823&filename=26203263.jpg&res=landing





and here without a mask test.



31 camera
aperture 18 f
ISO 125
Ultra High
Lens 70mm
Canon 5D II RAW

All photos I did the exact mask.
I expected better quality

62

Bug Reports / Re: mask not imported 2

« on: September 12, 2012, 10:53:36 PM »

It is as you say.
is the difference in size.
A few pixels difference.

I have no idea why they came.
thank you

63

Bug Reports / Re: mask not imported 2

« on: September 12, 2012, 10:19:52 PM »

Alexey  of course, so I tried.
You'll see how it works.
Will send you the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3xBLJOxlmg&feature=youtu.be

64

Bug Reports / mask not imported 2

« on: September 12, 2012, 09:28:06 PM »

I made a mask for all the pictures.
I did export masks.
The program has done it well.

Trying to do the import, but it does not work.
The program they try to process the mask. But you do not see any effect.

Me wondering for all files at once.
For a single.
Background alpha file.
Zero effect

Import mask work right after recording.
But how to reload the images in a new project masks do not work

65

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 12, 2012, 02:29:03 AM »

Alexey and his team are incredible, willing, open, generous and innovative
a fully agree with this opinion.
I invested about $ 100 000 in RenderFarm, and a lot of time.
Maybe I'm not patient, for that check all the options.
I tested the program very hard.
I admire your results, you do the best scans I've seen in my life.
Please do not take my tests as an arrogant expression.
Wonder what 123D for doing the same set better.
You may need to use a special spell.
And then the program will work as expected.

do not give up

66

General / Re: Who can save the goddess

« on: September 11, 2012, 09:15:05 PM »

Alexey
Just as I promised to send a clean original image.
If you do it better than I do that I will bow low.

Regards
http://wtrns.fr/E8JLeirn3EHUbqQ

67

General / Re: Who can save the goddess

« on: September 11, 2012, 06:23:23 PM »

To an hour to send clear photos of RAW

68

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 11, 2012, 06:07:02 PM »

I'm talkin 'about the facts and show your work.
You sound like a haunted priest in the church there is one God and is called Allah.
I Yamantaka goddesses towers.
And it looks like that the Agisoft not go to paradise.
It's all about quality. I can pay $ 5,000 to the program will have a good quality.

What I will do with the fact that the model home will look like poop.
Maybe give autotesk models.
But they offer a program that does it well.
It can fly a helicopter 10 years and do ortomaps.
And you're a faithful follower of Agisoft.
But I deal with computer graphics for 20 years.
I know his stuff and I have no problems with his eyesight.
Customer did not care what the model.
What matters is the quality, and only on that you can earn.

If someone offended tone of my speech is very sorry.
I am frustrated with the effects of my scans.
And the idea that I have to give my work for autodesk ....

Here are the test files
as someone wants to improve the goddess.
https://www.wetransfer.com/dl/637nmcFf/00bd5bbc7b9221de908cd9ac4c8988b1f2b651ac1f97c859fa37307414a16c15cf99cbbe5218b3a

69

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 11, 2012, 05:30:51 PM »

Hello


I tried a variety of ways.
Of the picture.
Photos trimmed.
Funniest pictures.
Photos corrected adobe lightroom.
75 photos
150 photos
Effects have always been weak.

The most annoying are the empty spaces.
The program fills them and makes a lot of mistakes.

Currently, she returned to Milan.
I have thousands of pictures, but I'm doing the first tests.
And the program again disappointing.
I do not want to share their work for autodesk, but I see no other option.

70

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 11, 2012, 05:08:13 PM »

I simply reply to this post.
Someone says that PhotoScan is much better than 123Dcatch
Someone should buy it.
Someone said it ?e123Dcatch technology review article. Due is a toy.

I am very disappointed with the quality of PhotoScan.
I bought a program for professional work.
I do not like to share models for autodesk

Working time is a drama, even on a very powerful computer processor 24.
It can be forgiven.
But your work is not acceptable.
One big mistake.

Sorry to those who like PhotoScan other,
but that's my opinion.
A review was based on tests

71

General / Re: Who can save the goddess

« on: September 11, 2012, 11:26:27 AM »

For now,  123D catch goddesses saved.
It's not perfect, but clearly better than agisoft PhotoScan

72

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 11, 2012, 11:21:04 AM »

Show me some good quality scans.
The only guy in the world to do something this program something good
This http://www.ir-ltd.net/why-why-upgrade-to-agisoft-pro-edition.
But this guy has invested hundreds of thousands, and scans improves in Zbrush.

In this forum, I see only the problems of users.
Where is the sense of the effects of gallery work! ?
Show me your scans, and I'll tell you what it's worth this program.
I say I'm not only show you the evidence.
Do you have pictures. You can compare them.

73

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 11, 2012, 12:03:50 AM »

loss of words.
You're right.
Most can not be wrong

I bought it too and thought it would be better.
But I see results, compares the work programs.
I draw conclusions.

74

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 10, 2012, 11:21:27 PM »

You can talk a lot.
But one picture replaces a 1000 words.
Nobody could do it better.
This set of pictures released online.

http://www.agisoft.ru/forum/index.php?topic=655.0

Here's the results of 123Dcatch

75

General / Re: Why photoscan over 123Dcatch ? newbie

« on: September 10, 2012, 09:55:56 PM »

That's what I thought as you do, and for that I bought Agisoft
What you say is pure theory.
I show these images.
The same set of data.
Even the blind see the advantage, free software ...
I regret that