1
General / Re: Ugly mesh importing and rendering from 3DS Max
« on: June 04, 2018, 01:29:22 PM »
Have you found a solution to this issues? I am having the same problem.
Thanks,
Matt.
Thanks,
Matt.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General / Re: Size of files - airial images
« on: March 26, 2014, 11:28:11 AM »
Some more information is required to be able to answer your questions...
What average speed will the aircraft be flying at?
Is that 60% overlap in-flight and side?
Which camera and what lens are you using?
With that information it would be possible to at least come up with some estimates.
What average speed will the aircraft be flying at?
Is that 60% overlap in-flight and side?
Which camera and what lens are you using?
With that information it would be possible to at least come up with some estimates.
3
General / Re: "Not Enough Memory"
« on: January 07, 2014, 01:17:09 AM »
My guess would be that you are running out of RAM??
4
General / Re: CPU and GPU benchmarks
« on: January 06, 2014, 02:19:42 PM »
Exciting!! Looking forward to seeing the results!
5
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: December 18, 2013, 01:11:06 AM »
Hi Alexey,
Small request... Would it be possible to put the "Filter Photos by Marker" button back onto the Photos pane toolbar. I found it much easier and quicker there?
Thanks.
Small request... Would it be possible to put the "Filter Photos by Marker" button back onto the Photos pane toolbar. I found it much easier and quicker there?
Thanks.
6
General / Re: High demands need a high end computer. Help please
« on: November 14, 2013, 12:50:04 PM »
Q. Do you have GPS coordinates for the images? Are you able to select 'Ground Control' while aligning images?
I perform surface modelling via a UAV and have just processed a job with 2500 images in 4hrs on my custom built portable workstation ($7k). So your jobs are well within reasonable capabilities if you invest in some decent processing power. Your budget of $7-$10k should get you a beast of a machine that would chew up jobs like that!!
Like the other posters have stated, more RAM will make no difference unless you are actually running out of RAM and the GPU is not used for Align Photos. Big beefy CPU(s) is what you need!
I perform surface modelling via a UAV and have just processed a job with 2500 images in 4hrs on my custom built portable workstation ($7k). So your jobs are well within reasonable capabilities if you invest in some decent processing power. Your budget of $7-$10k should get you a beast of a machine that would chew up jobs like that!!
Like the other posters have stated, more RAM will make no difference unless you are actually running out of RAM and the GPU is not used for Align Photos. Big beefy CPU(s) is what you need!
7
General / Re: What is your "Average" Processing Time?
« on: November 11, 2013, 12:37:56 PM »
Short answer: your CPU is where the problem lies.
Your GPU is ok and from what I know if you don't have enough RAM the program will simply crash. More RAM will allow you to process larger jobs.
What size are your projects? How many images? Image size?
Unfortunately when dealing with large datasets you inevitably need a powerful computer.
Your GPU is ok and from what I know if you don't have enough RAM the program will simply crash. More RAM will allow you to process larger jobs.
What size are your projects? How many images? Image size?
Unfortunately when dealing with large datasets you inevitably need a powerful computer.
8
General / Re: Very 'wonky' buildings???
« on: October 14, 2013, 12:07:45 PM »
No, I hadn't tried that one yet. I will run a few tests with 'arbitrary' and see how I go.
Thanks.
Thanks.
9
General / Very 'wonky' buildings???
« on: October 13, 2013, 04:22:26 AM »
See attached image.
It is a tall structure (conveyor/train load out facility) that I am trying to get a more accurate ortho image of. I have tried outputting the image with various different settings but so far haven't had a lot of success.
I understand that this type of thing is very difficult for photogrammetry, ie tall or suspended features, but is there a 'preferred' setting/workflow in Photoscan to achieve the best results?
Thanks.
It is a tall structure (conveyor/train load out facility) that I am trying to get a more accurate ortho image of. I have tried outputting the image with various different settings but so far haven't had a lot of success.
I understand that this type of thing is very difficult for photogrammetry, ie tall or suspended features, but is there a 'preferred' setting/workflow in Photoscan to achieve the best results?
Thanks.
10
General / Re: Optimisation question
« on: October 10, 2013, 11:04:25 AM »
Thanks Porly, I thought that would trigger a response from someone!
I'll give that a go and see how I get on.
I wish I could have been at INTERGEO myself... perhaps next year?? Hope you enjoyed it.
Cheers.
I'll give that a go and see how I get on.
I wish I could have been at INTERGEO myself... perhaps next year?? Hope you enjoyed it.
Cheers.
11
General / Re: Optimisation question
« on: October 10, 2013, 09:53:58 AM »
Hmmm, it seems I always ask questions that no one can answer??
12
General / Optimisation question
« on: October 04, 2013, 04:50:03 PM »
When I run optimise on my sparse point cloud, what is the difference between having the images enabled and disabled?
Also, what is k4 and should I have that selected?
Thanks
Also, what is k4 and should I have that selected?
Thanks
13
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 01, 2013, 06:22:39 PM »
Got it. Thanks Alexey.
14
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: October 01, 2013, 04:31:30 AM »
I am definitely struggling with the 'Classify Ground Points'.
Initial run on default settings seemed to work ok.
I then ran it again with very different settings and very little seemed to happen.
I have since tried numerous other settings and again, very little (if anything), is happening.
I am leaving the parameter 'any class' selected in the 'from' box and have also tried a few of the others.
Is this process not yet fully functional or am I not doing something right?? I am using build 1745
It seems like it will be a very impressive to function to have and I'd love to be able to figure it out!! It would also be good to be able to export a point file (las etc) of individual class types.
Initial run on default settings seemed to work ok.
I then ran it again with very different settings and very little seemed to happen.
I have since tried numerous other settings and again, very little (if anything), is happening.
I am leaving the parameter 'any class' selected in the 'from' box and have also tried a few of the others.
Is this process not yet fully functional or am I not doing something right?? I am using build 1745
It seems like it will be a very impressive to function to have and I'd love to be able to figure it out!! It would also be good to be able to export a point file (las etc) of individual class types.
15
General / Re: Agisoft PhotoScan 1.0.0 pre-release
« on: September 30, 2013, 01:23:48 PM »Can anyone tell me what the default settings for 'classify ground points' are (max distance, max angle, cell size)? I have adjusted mine and forgotten what the defaults were. Every time I close and re-open PS it maintains my last set parameters and does not return to the default.
Many thanks.
max distance: 15
max angle: 1
cell size: 50
in build 1754
Thanks!
