81
General / Re: color enhancement
« Last post by Dieter on May 07, 2026, 09:00:02 AM »OK, found it!
Recent Posts
82
General / Colours in natural texture with faro panocam
« Last post by Dieter on May 07, 2026, 08:49:03 AM »We repeatedly have problems with color reproduction in the Natural Mode texture. When using our Faro Focus scanner with the PanoCam attachment, a non-color-accurate image is produced during the final "baking" of the texture, see Attachment 1. Even in areas where the PanoCam images are not used, areas are created in rainbow colors in "normal" photos. See Attachment 2.
How can I prevent this? We are using Agisoft 2.3.1.
How can I prevent this? We are using Agisoft 2.3.1.
83
Agisoft Cloud / Re: Agisoft Cloud Release Notes
« Last post by Agisoft Cloud Team on May 06, 2026, 11:42:29 AM »Released on 2026-05-06
New features
Full changelog is available in our knowledge base.
New features
- Added support for Metashape Professional 2.3.x
Full changelog is available in our knowledge base.
84
General / Re: Display problem with RTX 4000 Ada Generation
« Last post by lablatte on May 05, 2026, 12:55:05 PM »I freshly installed the Release 595 (596.36) and it work like a charm.
With no admin privilege or Direct X compatibility mode.
jnb, did you tried to restart your PC ?
With no admin privilege or Direct X compatibility mode.
jnb, did you tried to restart your PC ?
85
General / Re: Calibration.todict() method
« Last post by Paulo on May 05, 2026, 06:24:00 AM » :)m Thank you, Alexey
86
General / Re: mask ignored during texturing
« Last post by Paulov on May 05, 2026, 02:12:08 AM »I mean, that is the problem 
The mask is applied and yet the car is projected into the texture. I'll prepare a small project in the Standard version and pack it and make it availiable for download for you to test. I'll make a video showing the problem aswell, may be I'm doing something wrong but considering mask works for tie points...
The mask is applied and yet the car is projected into the texture. I'll prepare a small project in the Standard version and pack it and make it availiable for download for you to test. I'll make a video showing the problem aswell, may be I'm doing something wrong but considering mask works for tie points...87
Bug Reports / Metashape pro 2.3.1 thorws an open cl error on ubuntu 26.04 with AMD rocm stack
« Last post by grgoje on May 04, 2026, 11:52:18 PM »I deployed metashape pro 2.3.1 on my fresh kubuntu 26.04 install on a strix halo laptop.
Ubuntu 26.04 has rocm stack in it's default repos and i have installed the opencl as a part of it.
The GPU is visible to metashape as OpenCL and Vulkan units. It works perfectly for image alignment. But when i try to calculate depthmaps it throws Error: ciErrNum: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE (-11) at line 1175
I'm attaching a full console output, including the successful alignment phase. I have tried several datasets with the same results.
Best regards,
Grga
Ubuntu 26.04 has rocm stack in it's default repos and i have installed the opencl as a part of it.
The GPU is visible to metashape as OpenCL and Vulkan units. It works perfectly for image alignment. But when i try to calculate depthmaps it throws Error: ciErrNum: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE (-11) at line 1175
I'm attaching a full console output, including the successful alignment phase. I have tried several datasets with the same results.
Best regards,
Grga
88
General / Re: mask ignored during texturing
« Last post by Alexey Pasumansky on May 04, 2026, 04:50:34 PM »Hello Paulov,
Can you please share the results of texturing based on the single image only (other cameras disabled) and the same image with the mask applied?
Can you please share the results of texturing based on the single image only (other cameras disabled) and the same image with the mask applied?
89
General / Re: Calibration.todict() method
« Last post by Alexey Pasumansky on May 04, 2026, 04:37:18 PM »Hello Paul,
We have updated 2.3.1 release version to build 22446, where the problem should be fixed.
We have updated 2.3.1 release version to build 22446, where the problem should be fixed.
90
General / Metashape won't align chunks correctly
« Last post by nicole_bobbio on May 04, 2026, 12:32:23 PM »Hello,
I'm working on making a model of a painting for my thesis work (as such, unfortunately, I will not be able to post any picture of the work or the original photos), it's 590 photos. This is also my first ever photogrammetry project.
Up until now I had no problems. I divided the photos in two chunks, one for the front of the painting and one for the back. The back has physical markers, while the front doesn't. I aligned the photos, built the tie points, detected the existing markers, added new markers on the sides of the painting, built the two point clouds and cleaned them up. I made sure to match every new marker exactly on the front and the back, with the same exact name, so there would be no problem when aligning the two chunks based on the markers.
When I tried to align them though, it didn't align the markers correctly: markers with the same name were positioned a few millimeters off from each other. This showed even more when I merged the two chunks and I could see a clear space between the two point clouds along the sides.
I tried to align them again, unchecking the "fix scale" option, but nothing changed.
Is there anything else I can try? Did I mess up somewhere?
Thank you all in advance.
I'm working on making a model of a painting for my thesis work (as such, unfortunately, I will not be able to post any picture of the work or the original photos), it's 590 photos. This is also my first ever photogrammetry project.
Up until now I had no problems. I divided the photos in two chunks, one for the front of the painting and one for the back. The back has physical markers, while the front doesn't. I aligned the photos, built the tie points, detected the existing markers, added new markers on the sides of the painting, built the two point clouds and cleaned them up. I made sure to match every new marker exactly on the front and the back, with the same exact name, so there would be no problem when aligning the two chunks based on the markers.
When I tried to align them though, it didn't align the markers correctly: markers with the same name were positioned a few millimeters off from each other. This showed even more when I merged the two chunks and I could see a clear space between the two point clouds along the sides.
I tried to align them again, unchecking the "fix scale" option, but nothing changed.
Is there anything else I can try? Did I mess up somewhere?
Thank you all in advance.
