Hi Jim,
Thanks for the input. Although if I was going to go to those sort of lengths I probably may as well just set up my GPS, log some static and RTK in some GCP's. You are right though, I would have no redundancies to check against but for some of my 'less important' jobs this is not really an issue.
I have just done some testing of my own with the same set of data (30ha quarry site) both with ground control and completely without. The results are basically no different... when it comes to volume calculations anyway. Obviously the 2 data sets are a few metres apart but the relative accuracies look pretty good.
The table attached shows the differences between the 2 tests (note: the base models for the calcs hold a certain degree of estimation so with this in mind you could argue that the results are all but the same??)...
If anyone else has done any testing on this I would be keen to know your results??
Cheers!