Perfect settings to process data having fine geometry

[tanayaaus]

Hi,
I was processing a power plant data having fine geometry. But the output quality was very poor. I set the settings -
dense cloud - high
depth filtering- mild
I am attaching the sample.
I want some suggestion, what settings would be perfect for this kind of data.

[Bzuco]

If dense cloud is not good(without necessary details and with unwanted noise), then mesh/geometry can not be fine. Did you try ultra high quality dense cloud?

Did you try build mesh from depth maps only?...you should get better mesh result.

[DayGeckoArt]

If dense cloud is not good(without necessary details and with unwanted noise), then mesh/geometry can not be fine. Did you try ultra high quality dense cloud?

Did you try build mesh from depth maps only?...you should get better mesh result.

Are you sure about depth maps being better? I've only gotten much worse results from depth maps

[Bzuco]

In case drone photogrammetry I can not talk, but from ground if there are enough photos from different angles, depth maps method can better capture objects shapes.
Point cloud method simply creates meshes only where points are. It is 50:50 what is better.

What would help for power plant is make another set of photos from another angles, not only top down.