Hello Alexey, thank you for the prompt response.
My project is not an aerial survey but a kind of close-range scanning. The total picture I have is around 86,000. I split them into 7 smaller chunks and a final chunk, with enough overlapping each of them, having respectively 23,571 pictures, 24,683 pictures, 19,565 pictures, 14,595 pictures, 13,316 pictures, 15,651 pictures, 49,756 pictures, and the final chunk contains all of them together. It is quite consuming time and patience. Since this is a massive heritage building built in 700 CE, therefore involving many reliefs and details, making it more difficult to split them into more chunks than the above stated.
The recently running process is the one with 15,615 pictures with a data size exceeding 450 GB.
The computer we use has an Intel Xeon processor, and Quadro graphic card (P-2000), and is supported with 256 GB RAM. Agisoft Metashape Pro 1.8.3 is installed. We have not yet moved to 2.0 because of certain considerations and the excellence of this version in assisting us becomes one of the utmost reasons.
In my case, I need to analyze the antique measurement and proportion produced by the reconstruction of the target model. In other words, I need to have a solid and detailed 3D model, not the points, so I can research it and print it later.
Regarding your suggestions, what will happen if I reduced the face count set to 100 to 200 million? Would it reduce the quality drastically? By default, the parameter setting of the High count states 2,483,000,000 faces, the Medium has 828,000,000 faces, and the Low one has 268,000,000 faces. I kept the high faces as default and just started to create another one by trying the Medium faces setting (828,000,000), but still applied dense cloud as the source.
And what will happen if I use Depth Maps as the source instead of Dense Cloud?
I believe the other chunks above containing more pictures will have more faces.
What do you mean by generating a tiled model instead of the build-mesh? Do you mean directly going to, or generating the tiled model, and skipping or without processing the build-mesh? Is that okay? Because I thought the tiled model is the following or respective step after the build mesh process.
If that is possible, it will be an excellent way out for reducing the exhausting process.
And please Alexey, would you please provide me the guidance for the detailed steps, including the parameter settings?
Many thanks and regards,
Adiwan.