Hi José
Maybe "artifact" is the wrong term to use... I tried to show a close up in the screenshots below, but essentially when the dense cloud is built, it appears like one of the cameras is tilted, like a tile being lifted slightly above the rest of the point cloud to create this noise in the DEM when constructed. You can see in the Pre-DEM (flight before erosion) that it is a continuous surface, while in the Post-DEM (flight after erosion) there is the distinguished lifted corner that is created from some of the points being slightly above the rest of the dense cloud. It is not lifted by much, only a few centimeters at the most, but is enough to throw off erosion calculations when comparing the 2 DEMs. Classifying the dense cloud by point confidence, you can see these lifted regions have very low confidence (red=low, blue=high)... It might be as simple as just removing the low confidence points from the dense cloud, but I'm curious if there is something else that was causing the low confidence to begin with
As for why I didn't use a mesh, I am creating the DEM from the dense cloud directly so that it is created by IDW interpolation and retains as much resolution as possible to be able to run the erosion calculations.