Forum

Author Topic: PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture  (Read 27703 times)

oogawagga

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture
« on: November 09, 2013, 01:56:41 AM »
Hello,

We're looking to purchase an application (within the next two months) to create 3D models of cities from both low-level aerial and ground photographs.  We've read the post (http://www.agisoft.ru/forum/index.php?topic=674.15) comparing PhotoScan with 123Catch (aka Smart3DCapture) from last year, but as of right now, how would you rank the three applications for the task given above and why?

Photoscan Pro - http://www.agisoft.ru/products/photoscan/professional/
3DF Zephyr - http://www.3dflow.net/3df-zephyr-pro-3d-models-from-photos/
Smart3DCapture - http://www.acute3d.com/smart3dcapture/

Thanks!

Chris

FoodMan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • View Profile
Re: PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2013, 10:50:40 AM »
I have to say the Paris Model from their videos demo is quiet impressive... 142.000 photos !... woot..  :P

Wishgranter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1202
    • View Profile
    • Museum of Historic Buildings
Re: PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2013, 01:29:35 PM »
Will report a bit deeper. testing the new solution. but it seems to be SLOW.....

Accute SCANNER cost approx 8.000,-  EUR / Y E A R - their have problems with aligning as have tested so far - like 123D Catch and AUTODESK RECAP cloud solution. Its faster than agi, but as i say i got problems with aligning of different sets. the mesh is mostly OK, but with lower resolution
AS you mention cities from air and ground, you will use a LOT of images, so you will need the "PRO" version of Accute - approx 30.000 EUR per YEAR. because of their limitation of SCANNER edition


The 3DF zephyr DEMO - can test just 10 images, and it seems that it uses GPU just for the ALIGN stage. hard to say but it seems that is much slower than AGI, at least on the dataset that i could test...

For testing and verifiing if you capture cities right wold recommend PHOTOSCAN PRO. its one of the best price/performance app right now......

if need a bit more to know contact me on muzeumhb@gmail.com


« Last Edit: November 09, 2013, 07:00:17 PM by Wishgranter »
----------------
www.mhb.sk

3DPLUS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Dịch vụ máy in 3D: https://in3dplus.com tại tp.hcm
    • View Profile
    • Dịch vụ máy in 3D TP.HCM Việt Nam
Re: PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2018, 01:36:56 PM »
I saw some resulted 3Dscan from 3DF Zephyr, they are good. :D
Also, IN vIETNAM, they do 3dscaning with  3DF too
Dịch vụ scan 3D: https://blogin3d.com/dich-vu-scan-3d-quet-mau-3d-tp-hcm
Chuyên cung cấp máy in 3D và dịch vụ in 3D giá rẻ tp.HCM
Máy scan và dịch vụ scan quét 3D tp.hcm Việt Nam .
Website: https://in3dplus.com/  | https://www.facebook.com/Mayin3Dgiare.3DPrinterVietNam | https://plus.google.com/+Taomau3d-in3D-taomaunhanh

Mathias S

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Data Processing/Mapping/Modeling/Geovisualization
    • View Profile
Re: PhotoScan Pro vs 3DF Zephyr vs Acute 3D Smart3DCapture
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2018, 01:09:17 AM »
You also can check these model results on Sketchfab. Vlad processed one model in several softwares: Photoscan, RealityCapture, 3DF Zyphr Pro, OpenMVG/OpenMVS, Bentley ContextCapture, Autodesk Remake /ex.Memento.

https://sketchfab.com/ssh4/collections/photogrammetry-tools-comparison