Forum

Author Topic: cannot run last PhotoScan version 1.0.0.1795 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS  (Read 4535 times)

jan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Hello,

I can run a previous stable Photoscan version (0.9.1.1714) in Linux (ubuntu 10.04 LTS), but not the last stable version (i.e. 1.0.0.1795) on the same OS.

Normally I double click on the photoscan.sh file, and then press the button "run in terminal" to open photoscan (this normally works), but with the latest version, nothing happens.

Anybody knowing a solution?

regards,
Jan

Alexey Pasumansky

  • Agisoft Technical Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13913
    • View Profile
Re: cannot run last PhotoScan version 1.0.0.1795 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2014, 06:11:14 PM »
Hello Jan,

Could you please run the application through the terminal ./photoscan.sh and report back if any error is displayed there.
Best regards,
Alexey Pasumansky,
Agisoft LLC

jan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Re: cannot run last PhotoScan version 1.0.0.1795 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2014, 05:09:15 PM »
Hello Alexey,

sorry for my late respond,

after typing ./photoscan.sh in the proper folder (i.e. the folder containing all the files extracted from photoscan-pro_1_0_0_amd64.tar.gz), the following appears on the terminal:

./photoscan.sh: 12: /media/sda3/SHARED/software/photoscan-pro/linux/stable-version-1.0.0-build: not found

regards,
Jan

Alexey Pasumansky

  • Agisoft Technical Support
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13913
    • View Profile
Re: cannot run last PhotoScan version 1.0.0.1795 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2014, 05:20:27 PM »
Hello Jan,

I think there's a problem with the path to the folder - there's "space" symbol in the path (after "build") which script can't handle.
Best regards,
Alexey Pasumansky,
Agisoft LLC

jan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Re: cannot run last PhotoScan version 1.0.0.1795 in ubuntu 10.04 LTS
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2014, 05:58:33 PM »
Thank you Alexey,

this was indeed the problem!