I tried HDR shots for scanning, but it wasn't a big success:
- if one out of 3 shots is moved, your camera position is useless (so you have 3 times the chance of moved photos, if it is a little bit windy this can be a problem).
- ideally you need more than 3 exposures at small increments. If the exposures are too far apart (more than 2 EVs) or severely overexposed/underexposed you get banding artifacts in your HDR
- merging 200+ files to HDR is a long process, takes more diskspace, etc.
- overall the HDR shots were not as sharp as single shots
Photoscan worked fine with the HDR files however (apart from a much higher memory use), and I can imagine that it could be useful in some situations. But I prefer to use a properly exposed non-HDR photo, it's so much easier.
There was the factory interior showcased a while back. I'm curious how many shots they took for that environment.