Poor quality results in 1.1.6 build 2038 (64 bit)

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Hello James,

The parameters are shown in the Chunk Info screenshot in the previous post.

Also I've sent you the link to the project data (via PM) of our results. Probably you can provide the 1.0.4 project file where you've go the results that better suit you need?

[tutoss]

But why with the sparse cloud without any hole the dense cloud have two big holes?
The only difference on the workflow is the "pair preselection" method.
Anyway, for aerial photos with geolocation info, the "reference" method is the idea..

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Hello tutoss,

What alignment options were you using in the project that resulted in the two holes in the dense cloud?

Usually straight borders of such holes are related to the lack of the matching points between the photos related to the area. Pairs with low number of matching points are filtered out and are not involved in the depth maps generation process.

[tutoss]

Hi alexey,
the tipical settings for aerial data with geolocation info:

accuracy: high
pair preselection: reference
key point limit: 40000
tie point limit: 0 (to replicate Photoscan 1.0)

Dense cloud medium and aggresive filter.