Hi Alexey,
I've optimized and generated the dense point cloud, DEM, mesh, tiled model, and contours in "NAD83(HARN) / California zone 2 (ftUS) (EPSG::2871)." The surveyor has also provided elevations in both NAVD88 and NGVD29 vertical datums, but they provided horizontal (Northing and Easting) coordinates only in NAD83, not NAD27.
I used "Convert" in the Reference pane to convert the model generated in NAD83/NAVD88 to NAD27 by selecting "NAD27 / California zone II (EPSG::26742)." My thinking was to do the horizontal conversion NAD83 --> NAD27 first, then manually enter the surveyor's elevations of GCPs relative to NGVD29 into the model to obtain accurate X,Y,Z coordinates in NAD27 / NGVD29.
The resulting horizontal (X,Y) coordinates for my GCPs in NAD27 after the conversion are shifted approximately 17 feet in the X-Y plane relative to their Northing and Easting positions when converted to the same coordinate system (EPSG::26742) using ArcGIS or AutoCAD. I'm surprised the default conversions in Photoscan gave such a different result than ArcGIS or AutoCAD, and curious what could be the reason for this.
As a possible workaround, I'm thinking of duplicating the chunk with the model in NAD83/NAVD88, applying the Photoscan conversion from NAD83 (EPSG::2871) to NAD27 (EPSG::26742), then re-importing the GCPs using Northing and Easting coordinates from ArcGIS in NAD27 and elevations in NGVD29 provided by the surveyor. Does this approach sound like it would work?
To resolve this difficulty for future projects, I'd like to create a custom PRJ conversion from NAD83/NAVD88 (EPSG::2871) to NAD27/NGVD29 (EPSG::26742). Can you advise how to generate such a custom PRJ conversion and how to use it in Photoscan?
Thanks in advance for your help,
LR