Hi !
I'm currently trying to generate super thin mesh of a slab in order to modeling the smallest deformations.
I have created a super dense point cloud of the slab (avg 1.6pts/mm²)
As it's a almost flat surface (there is no overhang), I was going to use height field meshing as its generation is much faster than arbitrary meshing.
As I want to keep the dense cloud resolution, I don't need any decimation of the mesh. So I used a face-number custom-value set at 0.
But it create me a super low resolution mesh (about 150 000 faces)...whereas if I used arbitrary meshing with the same parameter, I got my desired mesh (more than 53 000 000 faces)
I finally got what I needed, but to my mind I could have done it quicker using height field meshing.
Maybe there is a problem in custom-value height field meshing ?
Regards