Agisoft PhotoScan 1.4.0 pre-release

[JMR]

During masks creation an apparent bug causes that if one saves the project, some masks created in previous session will disappear. if you open a photo that already had mask it seems not to be masked. Then if you exit and open again, you'll see it again... some other weird behaviors have been observed when one uses save command/button while creating several orthos under the same chunk, requiring the program to be re-started to let things right.

I wonder if you can reproduce this error as well.
regards,
GEOBIT

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Hello JMR,

Which pre-release build you are using? I wasn't able to reproduce the issue with masking in both PSX and PSZ format.

[JMR]

I've sent a mail with detailed info.
Regards,
GEOBIT

[Diego]

Hello Alexey,

Error BuildOrthomosaic for version 1.4.0 build 5310
Error: TIFFReadTile: unexpected error for version 1.4.0 build 5310

Logs:

2017-11-24 13:56:36 Estimating resolution...
2017-11-24 13:56:37 Finished processing in 0.938 sec (exit code 1)
2017-11-24 13:56:45 Checking for missing images...
2017-11-24 13:56:45 checking for missing images... done in 0.29 sec
2017-11-24 13:56:45 Finished processing in 0.29 sec (exit code 1)
2017-11-24 13:56:45 BuildOrthomosaic: projection = Planar, surface = DEM, blending mode = Mosaic, pixel size = 0.5 x 0.5
2017-11-24 13:56:45 Analyzing DEM...
2017-11-24 13:56:45 estimating tile boundaries... done in 0.04 sec
2017-11-24 13:56:45 generating 4270x6640 orthophoto (7 levels, 0 resolution)
2017-11-24 13:56:45 selected 81 cameras
2017-11-24 13:56:45 Orthorectifying images...
2017-11-24 13:56:45 Orthorectifying 81 images
2017-11-24 13:57:20 Finished orthorectification in 34.522 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:20 selected 4 tiles
2017-11-24 13:57:20 selected 4 tiles
2017-11-24 13:57:20 Updating partition...
2017-11-24 13:57:22 25 of 55 processed in 2.02 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:23 16 of 46 processed in 0.887 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:23 6 of 39 processed in 0.04 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:23 4 of 31 processed in 0.021 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:23 partition updated in 3.588 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:23 selected 5 tiles
2017-11-24 13:57:23 Updating orthomosaic...
2017-11-24 13:57:24 loaded partition in 0.178 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:24 boundaries extracted in 0.054 sec
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-951, -914] - [-947, -911] from 11x5 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-952, -906] - [-947, -905] from 11x10 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -914] - [-947, -909] from 11x9 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -914] - [-947, -910] from 11x7 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -908] - [-947, -905] from 11x12 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -907] - [-947, -905] from 11x11 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -910] - [-947, -905] from 11x11 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 can't parse geo key directory
2017-11-24 13:57:24 region overflow: reading [-956, -912] - [-948, -907] from 11x10 image
2017-11-24 13:57:24 libtiff error: 4294966272: Col out of range, max 10
2017-11-24 13:57:24 Finished processing in 38.927 sec (exit code 0)
2017-11-24 13:57:24 Error: TIFFReadTile: unexpected error

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Hello Diego,

Can you please send any sample image from the set? If you are working with the multiplane camera approach, then send all the images for one camera instance.

[Diego]

Hello Diego,

Can you please send any sample image from the set? If you are working with the multiplane camera approach, then send all the images for one camera instance.

Hello Alexey,

Already send example of images to your mail, thanks.

Best regards,

[bisenberger]

Listed in change log Version 1.4.0 build 5076
• Added support for multiple dense clouds/models in a single chunk.

How does this work? I have tried creating multiple dense clouds in a single chunk and merging chunks with dense clouds, both result in chunk with single dense cloud.

[GrinGEO]

Does the Dense Cloud classification still work? Im not able to do it in auto mode at the prerelase 1.4

any suggestions?

[bisenberger]

Does the Dense Cloud classification still work? Im not able to do it in auto mode at the prerelase 1.4

any suggestions?

The menu selection for this is messed up. See this post:
http://www.agisoft.com/forum/index.php?topic=7730.msg38082#msg38082

You can get around it by using the option in Batch Process...

[zView]

Where can I find "Export Matches" in this new version?

Thanks,

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Where can I find "Export Matches" in this new version?

Hello zView,

Export Matches operation has been grouped with Export Cameras option now, so you can use now File Menu -> Export -> Export Cameras option and select the required file format (BINGO, PATB, ORIMA) that supports matching points export, then in the export dialog box check on "Tie points" option.

[zView]

Alexey it seems that there is a bug there. Bingo format for matches does not provide any image coordinates only:

ITER itera.dat
IMCO image.dat
GEOI geoin.dat
END

[Alexey Pasumansky]

Hello zView,

If you have checked on Tie Points option, then in the image.dat you'll get the coordinates of the matching points on the images.

[zView]

Thanks, it works.

[Alexey Pasumansky]

I have tested yours pre-release Agisoft PhotoScan version which has capability to export cesium 3D Tiles from Point-cloud and have faced one problem.
After i imported tiles to cesium viewer i can see that my point-cloud looks different by saying different i mean its looks like majority of points its gone and those who left don't contains information compare with point-cloud from how it looks like in PhotoScan.
I have tried to make medium and high quality point-clouds but result was the same.
Do you have any suggestion how can I receive correct output?

Hello Linas,

We have updated version 1.4.0 to build 5420 - there were some improvements and fixes for Cesium Tiles. Can you please check if the newly exported results do fit your needs now?