Hello Tunkali,
Thank you for additional information.
It looks like the part of the operation required more RAM than possible, even thought the first sub-step has been completed. You can try to enable disk swap and see it it helps (can suggest to extend it for additional 16-32 GB, just to be on the safe side).
The new meshing method is basing on the depth maps, whereas the old one took the dense cloud as a source, so if you compare the time for both approaches - you need to include the dense cloud generation for the older method.
Also is it possible, that you have used Height Field option before and not arbitrary?